Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service vs. IBM Netcool Network Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service (IIS) is an infrastructure lifecycle management solution that helps IT operations teams manage their compute, storage, and networking infrastructure—wherever it is—all from one place. Designed for Cisco UCS and HyperFlex customers, Cisco IIS simplifies infrastructure management to help teams deliver outstanding digital experiences. IIS can be used to operate with consistency and control, strengthen an organization's security posture, and increase…N/A
IBM Netcool Network Management
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Netcool Network Management integrates the IBM Tivoli Network Manager IP Edition, Tivoli Netcool/OMNIbus and Netcool Configuration Manager products into a unified solution that consolidates the management of networks.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceIBM Netcool Network Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceIBM Netcool Network Management
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceIBM Netcool Network Management
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceIBM Netcool Network Management
Small Businesses
HashiCorp Vagrant
HashiCorp Vagrant
Score 9.9 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Ansible
Ansible
Score 8.9 out of 10
Intermapper
Intermapper
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Ansible
Ansible
Score 8.9 out of 10
Cisco Prime LAN Management (discontinued)
Cisco Prime LAN Management (discontinued)
Score 7.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceIBM Netcool Network Management
Likelihood to Recommend
7.5
(23 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.5
(22 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
8.4
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
8.5
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceIBM Netcool Network Management
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
Cisco Intersight is very well suited for doing firmware upgrades across all of your cisco hardware. So far we have had no problems pushing out new firmware. It's also well suited for hardware management. Cisco TAC has the ability to pull logs for the IMC for themselves, which saves you from having to pull the logs yourself and then uploading them to the case. It may or may not be appropriate for upgrading operating systems. I have not been able to test it.
Read full review
IBM
This tool was integrated with Control-M, so whenever we receive any job failure, long-running job, job not started yet, etc, we receive an alert against it. This tool is also integrated with Maximo where we receive the incidents as well for it. Alert's color was as per the criticality of the job and that makes it very easy for an associate to act on it to resolve. We have the SLAs for the jobs as per the urgency of the jobs.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Ease of implementation of our UCS-X Platforms
  • Ease of Management
  • Cross visibility to our Data Center Infrastructure (Network, Storage, Compute)
  • Ability to Automate our configurations
  • Ability to create profiles for better consistency and standardization
Read full review
IBM
  • This is one of the best monitoring tools.
  • Very simple to user.
  • Color code makes it very simple as per severity.
  • We receive the heartbeat alert every hour that shows the system is running up and fine.
  • We have black, red, yellow, and orange color alerts that show the critical, urgent, major, and minor incidents.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Interface is quite slow
  • Interface tree (navigating between server, profile, blade, chassis, FI, etc) is counterintuitive and needs more links in the tree
  • Deploying minor changes takes much longer than in UCSM or UCSC
Read full review
IBM
  • Sometimes color differences of the incidents as per the criticality .
  • We don't receive the heartbeat alerts sometimes.
  • If the tool is down and we don't receive the alerts on the console we wait for the heartbeat alert and it makes some extra delay in resolving things.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
We use it every single day and love the ease of it and the integration of all our servers
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cisco
Usability of Cisco Intersight is highly dependent on the licensing purchased. The default (free) license level provides a lot of value for the minimal amount of effort to implement. The paid license levels provide additional features (detailed inventory, configuration management and deployment, etc.)
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cisco
Support for this platform is unmatched. I've used only a couple of other platforms, honestly, but Cisco Intersight's support system really works, and they do a great job. Any issue I've had was solved in a timely manner with a polite representative who cared about helping me and not just plainly reading off of a script that doesn't actually help. I rate it well.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
I personally think that Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service is at the top of its class when it comes to managing data center hardware. The cloud-connected design feels very modern and easy to use. The mobile app is something I wouldn't expect to get in a server management tool. The way it can update, monitor, and manage our servers is very nice. Overall, we are very happy with it.
Read full review
IBM
This is one of the essential tools for monitoring. This tool was integrated with Maximo and Control-M in my organization. So whenever any job failed in Control-M, we receive an alert against it in the IBM Netcool/OMNIbus. We receive the alerts in different colors as per the criticality. Black for critical ones(Sev1), red for urgent (Sev2), yellow for major(Sev3), and orange for minor(Sev4). So it makes an easy to operate and act on the alerts as per the severity. This tool is very user-friendly and easy to use. No additional training is required for the tool to operate, just a simple KT is enough.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • It is positive for a few people being able to manage a lot of hardware
  • It does put the management in the cloud, which some could argue is a security vulnerability.
  • It is difficult to move hardware from Intersign managed to standalone.
Read full review
IBM
  • Color feature of the alerts as per the criticality is the amazing feature.
  • Heartbeat alert is also an unique feature.
  • No additional training is required to use this tool. just a simple KT is enough.
Read full review
ScreenShots