TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Snort

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ASourcefire developed Snort, an open source intrusion prevention system capable of real-time traffic analysis and packet logging. Snort was acquired (and is now supported) by Cisco in 2013.N/A

    Microsoft Sentinel

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Sentinel (formerly Azure Sentinel) is designed as a birds-eye view across the enterprise. It is presented as a security information and event management (SIEM) solution for proactive threat detection, investigation, and response.

    $2.46

    per GB ingested

    Pricing
    SnortMicrosoft Sentinel
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Azure Sentinel
    $2.46
    per GB ingested
    100 GB per day
    $123.00
    per day
    200 GB per day
    $221.40
    per day
    300 GB per day
    $319.80
    per day
    400 GB per day
    $410.00
    per day
    500 GB per day
    $492.00
    per day
    More than 500 GB per day
    $492.00 + $98.40
    per day/plus each additional 100 GB increment
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    SnortMicrosoft Sentinel
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    SnortMicrosoft Sentinel
    Considered Both Products
    Cisco
    No answer on this topic
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    99%
    Would buy again
    73 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    59 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    71 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    93%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    52 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    66 Answers
    Features
    SnortMicrosoft Sentinel
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Snort and Microsoft Sentinel
    Feature
    Snort
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Sentinel
    8.5
    34 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Centralized event and log data collection00 Ratings9.134 Ratings
    Correlation00 Ratings8.835 Ratings
    Event and log normalization/management00 Ratings8.435 Ratings
    Deployment flexibility00 Ratings8.333 Ratings
    Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools00 Ratings8.933 Ratings
    Custom dashboards and workspaces00 Ratings8.435 Ratings
    Host and network-based intrusion detection00 Ratings8.030 Ratings
    Data integration/API management00 Ratings8.433 Ratings
    Behavioral analytics and baselining00 Ratings9.031 Ratings
    Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds00 Ratings8.733 Ratings
    Response orchestration and automation00 Ratings8.232 Ratings
    Reporting and compliance management00 Ratings7.35 Ratings
    Incident indexing/searching00 Ratings8.733 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    SnortMicrosoft Sentinel
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
    Score8.5 out of 10
    IBM Security QRadar SIEM
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Proofpoint Advanced Threat Protection
    Score8.4 out of 10
    SolarWinds Security Event Manager (SEM)
    Score8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    SnortMicrosoft Sentinel
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.1
    (5 ratings)
    8.5
    (74 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.5
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (27 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    SnortMicrosoft Sentinel
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cisco
    If a colleague was looking to tighten down their network I can easily recommend Snort to them. It gives you some more peace of mind knowing that its always scanning traffic for malicious looking code. Even things your major firewalls and security hardware might miss, Snort has picked up. Its an easy recommendation for me.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    What has really impressed me is how Microsoft Sentinel delivers centralised security monitoring across multiple data sources in our enterprise. It has reduced cost of handling large security logs by collecting and analyzing data without friction of managing traditional SIEM infrastructure. It is easy to work to integrate with Azure logs for quick data analysis.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cisco
    • IPS detection.
    • DoS detection.
    • Packet logging.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • The visual presentation of data is terrific, so including what we had prior to Microsoft Sentinel, it presents data in a much more usable way, so that's been quite refreshing. It's not quite as complex to understand what you're looking at.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cisco
    • At times can be unstable with Cisco bugs, require frequent upgrading.
    • FTD images that are being pushed for ASAs are less efficient from an administration standpoint, no CLI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • One feature that I would like to see improved is probably the log parsing. I think one of the big things that Splunk does better than Microsoft Sentinel is that it makes it easy to bring in new log streams of arbitrary formats and parse them out into columns and tables. Microsoft Sentinel is a lot more involved, though. It takes a lot more manual work to bring in different log sources and parse them out.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    it does the job reasonably well
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Mirosoft sentinel is easy to use once the inital setup is completed.The dashboard and centralized alerts make it simple to monitor security events and investigate incidents.Integration with other microsoft security tool is also helpful.Some advanced features and configurations can take time to understand, but overall it provides good, user-friendly security monitoring.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Microsoft support is one of the highest rated on the market. It has global and multilingual support. Calls can be made over the phone and the solution is virtually instantaneous with the help of Microsoft engineers. It's great!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cisco
    For our organization, the Cisco defense in depth concept works the best. While Cisco can be made to work with other vendors, we have found the best in depth protection by integrating Cisco products for maximum visibility. We had a Barracuda Web Filter, but it was difficult to maintain when you had limited scope on what you could block, so we created a whitelist only setup which required a lot of additional manpower. This wouldn't have covered new threats with DNS spoofing and the like. Sourcefire also integrated with our anti-malware platform (Cisco AMP) for even better visibility on what may be happening on the end users workstation. We are planning on adding in Cisco ISE to complete the approach and possibly stealthwatch to cover our bases in the future. The Palo Alto gear was interesting, but it was priced far out of our range.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Compared to platforms such as Splunk, LogRhythm, and Devo, Microsoft Sentinel’s cloud‑native, consumption‑based pricing model and reduced infrastructure overhead tend to offer better overall cost efficiency. This is especially true for organizations already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem, where Sentinel can deliver strong capabilities with a lower total cost of ownership.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Professional Services
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Did not use professional services
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cisco
    • Being open source, ROI on free is hard to beat for something that works.
    • I believe it greatly enhances the security of my network.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • It's probably neutral. We see value, but it's, again, tick that kind of expense stuff. We're getting more insight and value into what is going on in that cloud workspace, but just noting the cost. So it's probably neutral. I'm not directly responsible, so the full kind of return on investment kind of cycle, that's someone else's problem. I'm like the end user. It's my team that will look at the data and look at the output of Microsoft Sentinel. So the ROI, someone else can worry about that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Microsoft Sentinel Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotScreenshot of Microsoft Sentinel Capabilities