Juniper SRX vs. Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Juniper SRX
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Juniper SRX is a firewall offering. It provides a variety of modular features, scaled for enterprise-level use, based on a 3-in-1 OS that enables routing, switching, and security in each product.N/A
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Prisma SD-WAN (formerly known as CloudGenix but now as Prisma from Palo Alto Networks since being acquired in April 2020) offers an Autonomous SD-WAN solution, designed to provide app-policies aligned to business intent, along with direct access to multi-cloud and dev-ops frameworks to deliver unparalleled productivity gains, and cost-savings compared to first generation SD-WAN alternatives.N/A
Pricing
Juniper SRXPalo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Juniper SRXPalo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Juniper SRXPalo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Juniper SRXPalo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
Juniper SRX
8.7
5 Ratings
2% above category average
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
-
Ratings
Identification Technologies9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Visualization Tools7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Inspection8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Policy-based Controls10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Firewall Management Console7.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting and Logging8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
VPN10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
High Availability10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Stateful Inspection10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Proxy Server9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Juniper SRXPalo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Small Businesses
pfSense
pfSense
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
pfSense
pfSense
Score 9.2 out of 10
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Score 9.4 out of 10
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Juniper SRXPalo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(8 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.4
(3 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Juniper SRXPalo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN
Likelihood to Recommend
Juniper Networks
SRXs seem to be well suited at the enterprise level for plain routers, firewalls, and IDP/IDS. They work well on MPLS and Ethernet, including Internet. I have 3 SRXs also performing edge duty, with 2 in a high availability (HA) cluster. The Juniper line of SRXs provides a good range of scaling from small business to extremely large enterprise. Wire speed is a common comparison factor and Juniper shines in that area.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
CloudGenix would be suited for any company that has an internet connection if you have multiple sites you could use this to help with network traffic and what should take precedence over other applications. If you didn't have various sites, you could go with another type of internet connection.CloudGenix may not be suited for that scenario.
Read full review
Pros
Juniper Networks
  • Edge Device (Tunneling & Routing)
  • Routing Instances
  • Zone Based Firewall
  • L3 Gateway/Vlan termination
  • DHCP Server & DHCP Relay
  • Good support community & Good available documentation
  • Good support by the Vendor
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Circuit Monitoring
  • QOS of network traffic
  • High Availability
Read full review
Cons
Juniper Networks
  • My only real criticism of the product is that it's hard to figure out how to upgrade the firmware from the CLI via TFTP via the docs, but it works great once you get it sorted.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Some warning messages are hard to pinpoint the actual issue.
  • Support was faster at first, seems to not be as quick as in the beginning.
Read full review
Support Rating
Juniper Networks
This is the one area where I have a beef with Juniper. When I called into Cisco TAC, 90% of the time, the first person I spoke with was able to resolve my issue. With Juniper TAC, 90% of the time, the first person I speak with is not able to resolve my issue, seems to almost be reading from a script, and must escalate my ticket. All of which takes time.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
The support was super fast in the beginning. Sometimes it seems now that the support does not get back to you as quickly. When we do get in contact with the support, they are usually knowledgeable and can help find the problem. The support has also been easy to work with.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Juniper Networks
Juniper SRX stands tall compared to all these products for Large Service Provider Networks, where traffic volume is larger. Also, cost comparison with SRX's few other products can also be another contributing factor while selecting this. As well as Juniper Routers, Switches, and multiple products from the same vendor to maintain one single vendor environment. As well as Juniper Support is also really good.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
We evaluated Silverpeaks and Cisco. We found that CloudGenics' had a pricing model that met our needs. The sales team we worked with went over our existing environment thoroughly to provide the right size solution without compromising or limiting our technology needs. While the overall solutions form each vendor would have worked, we simply believed CloudGenic was the right fit for our company based on price, sales, support, and functionality.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Juniper Networks
  • It is a workhorse for our field operations. It provides the last touch for an ISP to the customer. The customer has no view of the device, but with the repeatability of the device, they do not need to.
  • The ability to roll out a dynamic routing protocol attached to a security zone allows elasticity to the environment that supports growth.
  • VLAN support on the inside interfaces allow this to be the only device in some smaller deployments we install these in.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Reduced Down time
  • Improved throughput due to their intelligent data analytics
  • Full utilization of all data circuits
Read full review
ScreenShots