CoSchedule vs MeetEdgar

• The monthly calendar view gives me a broad overview of all the content we have in production.
• The notes section within each blog topic helps me keep an organized list of items or links relevant to that topic.
• The headline analyzer gives me another option to test my headline before publishing, to see how it scores.

Read full review

• The library is done very well. It posts content on the last-in-first-out basis and it lets you add multiple variations of posts for the same piece of content.
• It's easy to manage multiple accounts at once.
• It's very user-friendly and it's easy to get a hang of it.

Read full review

• Would like to replicate some of the functionality of Buffer (sharing other content easily from multiple sources) to consolidate our marketing calendar in one place.

Read full review

• Inability to use multiple photos for a single Facebook post.
• Photo resolution will be shrink down to mobile friendly resolutions. This might be enough for most users/organizations, though.

Read full review

• Probably too early to tell for certain but it is definitely value priced right now. Fully developed content management platforms are running in $15-$20k per year range and more. You can get into a CoSchedule solution for $
• Team has found it easy to sign on and review tasks so this is a big time saver. More could be done to enable Guests easier access to content they need to review
• It's way faster that other scheduling apps we have tried. The fact that it runs on a cloud based app or inside your Wordpress app is a real plus. Auto save feature also means you don't have to remember to save your content.

Read full review

• It is important to keep a content presence in social media especially at a time where organic reach is low both in percentage and quantity. Edgar makes sure that we do and drive a lot more traffic versus our previous social media content sharing model.

Read full review