Bonterra Grants Management vs. Fluxx Grantmaker

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bonterra Grants Management
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Bonterra's single-platform Grants Management solution removes grantmaking complexities for better alignment with the corporate mission. Used to streamline, simplify, and automate the grantmaking process for grantmakers and grantseekers alike. Boasts the most flexible workflow engine in the CSR industry, for greater efficiency, data-driven decision making, and alignment between the corporate mission and philanthropy efforts. Bonterra's Grants Management solution reduces administrative…N/A
Fluxx Grantmaker
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Fluxx in San Francisco offers Grantmaker, this being their grant management platform for funders, providing clear data exploration tools and customizable dashboard, dynamic workflow with audit trail, and many collaboration and sharing tools.N/A
Pricing
Bonterra Grants ManagementFluxx Grantmaker
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Bonterra Grants ManagementFluxx Grantmaker
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact team@info.bonterratech.com for more information about pricing.—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Bonterra Grants ManagementFluxx Grantmaker
Considered Both Products
Bonterra Grants Management

No answer on this topic

Fluxx Grantmaker
Chose Fluxx Grantmaker
Fluxx is not only more intuitive than CyberGrants, its interface is also smoother and easier. Fluxx allows proposers to enter and attach proposal information in a more appealing platform than in CyberGrants. Fluxx also retains more historic data than CyberGrants.
Chose Fluxx Grantmaker
CyberGrants didn't have the advanced features we desired, such as the ability to configure and manage processes and graphing/data visualization.
Chose Fluxx Grantmaker
Not included above because it is not in the system is Salesforce Foundation Connect.

Again, I am always hesitant with this type of question. We selected grant maker because it offered the best fit for our organization's working style and culture. There is also a personal level …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Bonterra Grants ManagementFluxx Grantmaker
Small Businesses
Blackbaud Grantmaking
Blackbaud Grantmaking
Score 9.0 out of 10
Blackbaud Grantmaking
Blackbaud Grantmaking
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Workday Financial Management
Workday Financial Management
Score 8.3 out of 10
Workday Financial Management
Workday Financial Management
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Bonterra Grants ManagementFluxx Grantmaker
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
2.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Bonterra Grants ManagementFluxx Grantmaker
Likelihood to Recommend
Bonterra
CyberGrants is very adaptable, so it's ideal for any team that has a large number of grants to review, especially teams with multiple grant applications running on different timetables. Their employee engagement features, while not something we've used, are an area we'd love to explore further, because they create an overall snapshot of giving to an organization (tying in-kind support from volunteerism, etc. in with gift matching contributions and grant applications). If you only receive a few grant applications, or a lot of your grant applicants are very hesitant to use computers or online applications, it might not be as worth it for you.
Read full review
Fluxx
Fluxx is well-suited for use by both small and large non-profits. Fluxx provides an intuitive interface and accurately houses grant proposal application data. Fluxx may be less useful at organizations where multiple funding layers exist, such as at community foundations which house multiple philanthropic funds. Fluxx has been an excellent product over the 10 years I have worked with it
Read full review
Pros
Bonterra
  • Custom grant applications - it was easy for us to create applications that asked exactly the right questions. Features like downloadable budget templates were perfect for us, too.
  • Easy review process - we're able to see the status of any grant's review process in just a few clicks.
Read full review
Fluxx
  • It's easy to find grant records and related information.
  • Excellent tool for managing and displaying processes.
Read full review
Cons
Bonterra
  • Help guides on the admin page aren't always the most helpful for the specific questions I've had.
  • Reporting is almost TOO comprehensive - it can be a little overwhelming at first!
Read full review
Fluxx
  • Autofill of past information
  • Recommendations of other grants
  • Better word count amounts
Read full review
Support Rating
Bonterra
No answers on this topic
Fluxx
I have an assigned rep who is very responsive and is able to answer any questions. Other than that, the technical support has been terrible. I often don't waste time documenting bugs because I know they likely won't get fixed or even followed-up on. Instead, I search for workarounds.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Bonterra
No answers on this topic
Fluxx
Not included above because it is not in the system is Salesforce Foundation Connect. Again, I am always hesitant with this type of question. We selected grant maker because it offered the best fit for our organization's working style and culture. There is also a personal level of service that Fluxx offers that differed from other vendors (Smart Simple is similar in this way too). At the time we made the selection, one of the main influencers was the number of large foundations adopting the platform. As they invested in features, those features rolled out to the rest of the clients. This offered us access to functionality we would not have been able to afford otherwise. We moved from another vendor whose platform allowed for customization as well, but if they built it for one client, you still had to pay for it and pay ongoing yearly fees. So, the SAAS model adopted by Fluxx appealed to us. This has paid dividends as features have been developed. For example, one large foundation added the capability to track program-related investments alongside normal grantmaking activities within Fluxx. This is not functionality we could have paid to develop, but we have program-related investments that we wanted to track alongside grants and that feature was available to us because the development was paid for by that funder. That said, most of the above vendors have compelling products (as well as others), so be sure you look at your options and talk to users (other than the ones they provide you in the reference list) and check the Idealware guides
Read full review
Return on Investment
Bonterra
  • The time saved on administrative work is a huge win. We used a simple web form for our applications, and spent a lot of time and energy manually entering details into our old system.
Read full review
Fluxx
  • The time it takes me to pull a grant proposal together is less now because many of my talking points are organized within Grantmaker.
  • I feel more connected to my team even though I am a remote freelancer.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Bonterra Grants Management Screenshots

Screenshot of pre-qualification questionnaires and automated routing and approval workflows, to make it easy for eligible grant applicants to submit proposals.Screenshot of where grant allocations can be closely tracked against corresponding budget line items, ensuring they stay within set budget limitations.Screenshot of enriched reporting and data visualization capabilities, to bring philanthropic impact stories to life.