Cyberoam vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cyberoam
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Sophos’s Cyberoam offers UTM and NGFW products. Cyberoam provides the full suite of modularized firewall services, as well as real-time reporting, for enterprise-level use.N/A
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is an intrusion prevention system (IPS) used to stop zero-day attacks inline in real-time. In addition to the prevention of known threats, the solution helps to stop never-before-seen exploit attempts and command and control with its inline deep learning engines that aims to provide prevention of zero-day injection attacks and evasive command and control.N/A
Pricing
CyberoamPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CyberoamPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CyberoamPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Features
CyberoamPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
Cyberoam
8.7
2 Ratings
0% above category average
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
-
Ratings
Identification Technologies8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Visualization Tools8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Inspection7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Policy-based Controls9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Firewall Management Console8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting and Logging9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
VPN8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
High Availability9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Stateful Inspection9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Proxy Server9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CyberoamPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Small Businesses
pfSense
pfSense
Score 8.8 out of 10
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
Score 7.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.3 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CyberoamPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(3 ratings)
8.5
(6 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
CyberoamPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Likelihood to Recommend
Cyberoam
Our organization found that Cyberoam is a cost-effective solution compared to other vendors. Cyberoam was having issues with SSO for Web Filtering. For, web filtering and application blocking, Cyberoam does not contain enough signatures or data so we can not achieve the goal of all of the sites that need to be blocked. Cyberoam is great because of its ease of use feature.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
Palo Alto NTP is an appropriate suite of protection for any enterprise environment or anyone that truly needs some serious perimeter protection in a one-stop, all-in-one unit. There are no modules or add-ons or clunky interfaces to deal with it; everything works out of one management plane, licensing, implementation, monitoring. updating, etc. As a network admin, that is immensely valuable to me. Additionally, I get real-time reporting on all the stuff NTP is catching, and it is nothing to shirk at. The real value in NTP comes in only after you begin doing SSL-decryption, however, to truly inspect the traffic. Short of that, you are just seeing a bunch of encrypted data and the NTP suite of tools isn't going to avail you. NTP plus decryption, though, is invaluable!
Read full review
Pros
Cyberoam
  • Accurate and precise bandwidth shaping
  • Utm features are completely reliable,uses mainly for conducting exams smoothly.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • The threat engine has constant updates for important threats.
  • Wildfire helps supplement the Threat engine to help protect against 0 day threats.
  • The way the threat engine can be added at different levels to different zones and policies helps to ensure business essential traffic can have policies that are tuned to ensure traffic will flow.
Read full review
Cons
Cyberoam
  • Without mentioning an alternative brand, there is another leading company who has updated with firewall UI quite a bit. They offer an expanded line-up to meet a wider array of needs including specific appliances for web caching, proxy servers, and other products that have the same and familiar UI across the products. Each of the products does have some overlap so that customers can choose the right appliance for their use case.
  • After being acquired by Sophos, we saw our year-over-year costs escalate significantly since our original maintenance contract. They should consider revisiting the pricing, especially for education.
  • They should consider a current market analysis and see how the market is changing and adapting with other lower cost appliances for their product line up.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Cost is high, but it is a premium product
  • Endpoints are still vulnerable.
  • TAC engineers aren't always equipped with ATP knowledge
Read full review
Usability
Cyberoam
No answers on this topic
Palo Alto Networks
The reason to give ATP this rating is it specialises in detecting command control traffic whose primary role is to identify unusual outbound traffic patterns which blocks the command control communication and notifies to different security team to take necessary actions. ATP Global protect holds the responsibility of inspecting all the inbound and outbound traffic going to and from corporate system regardless of the network they are on. ATP plays a major role to identify the threats that blocks threats that could lead to data breach also it identifies any malicious file enter the system will be blocked proactively
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cyberoam
The main factor is cost, as we are a startup organization. That's the main reason we choose Cyberoam stacks up against other network security services.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
Having used Palo Alto Firewalls for years, implementing threat protection was the next step in perimeter security. Works much better than the few competitors I have personally used. Frequent content updates occur which may impact some policy rules, but that is normal across most vendors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cyberoam
  • Considerable change was noted in the utilization of administrators after switching from the software firewall.
  • It is relatively better priced when compared to fortigate.
  • Better log handling after the switch.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • After adding PA Threat Protection, we are now getting our network traffic completely inspected.
  • We are now applying security checks and scans like AV scan and Anti Spyware checks.
  • This is also giving visibility into threat and attack vectors that are using vulnerabilities and exploits to enter our environment.
Read full review
ScreenShots