Cypress.io vs. TestDrive

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cypress.io
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Cypress (or Cypress.io, also the name of the company in Atlanta that develops the tool) is a testing tool with the capability to run tests across multiple browsers, that aims to make setting up, writing, running and debugging tests easy.N/A
TestDrive
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
TestDrive offers end-to-test automation across browsers, client/server, and legacy applications, Windows GUI, Java, SAP, Salesforce or anything, without the need for high-cost, specialized automation engineers. 100% code-free Patented user annotation thinks as a user does Self-healing minimizes maintenance Automatic synchronization -including over single page web apps Cross-browser testing at the click of a button, even true of the previously difficult to automate, single page…N/A
Pricing
Cypress.ioTestDrive
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cypress.ioTestDrive
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
Cypress.ioTestDrive
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.2 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Selenium
Selenium
Score 8.2 out of 10
BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Selenium
Selenium
Score 8.2 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cypress.ioTestDrive
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(2 ratings)
8.4
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cypress.ioTestDrive
Likelihood to Recommend
Cypress.io Inc
Everything web-based should be testable. Even our highly dynamic content-providing web application works well. Hopefully, it will get a bigger user base in the future so that one can find even more support at StackOverflow or similar forums.
Read full review
Original Software
The more our business grew, the more we felt the risk on the horizon in that we needed somewhere to really manage and document our testing evidence. So, TestDrive helped us through the testing phase of the project by documenting and being able to access testing results, and also we had a broader scale view around regression testing.
Read full review
Pros
Cypress.io Inc
  • autimation of end to end testing of web UI and api
  • Getting insight on failing and passing tests
Read full review
Original Software
  • Easy automation.
  • Great customer service.
  • Easy script running.
  • Relatively easy to implement.
Read full review
Cons
Cypress.io Inc
  • Pick tool to identify elements doesn't work well.
  • Easier installation or manual for it.
Read full review
Original Software
  • Not suitable for small applications.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cypress.io Inc
Highly satisfied and [a] big fan.
Read full review
Original Software
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cypress.io Inc
Cypress.io is easy to start with and is independent of other automation tools. Unless we are looking for automating every edge case, Cypress.io can do it without using any plugins. Also, when a test fails, we can travel back to the state in which the test failed (aka time travel feature of Cypress.io), which makes debugging the failure or reporting the failure easy.
Read full review
Original Software
We have not tried other similar products so it is difficult to say, but we definitely enjoy this product and the support team to work with
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cypress.io Inc
  • Flaky tests can be caught easily
  • Regration testing of application with Cypress.io helps to maintain quality of the software product.
Read full review
Original Software
  • Thanks to TestDrive, our automation is always ready to run, and the script maintenance lag is removed, testing can go ahead, and issues are found quicker.
  • We no longer worry about varying response times for the application, nor do we no need to code "timing loops" to check if the application is in the right state.
Read full review
ScreenShots