HP BTODiscontinued vs. HPE OneView

HP Openview really helped us when we migrated our old SAP Data from IBM Platform to OpenText.

Incentivized

HPE Oneview has come along way. When they first put it out it was next to useless. Over the years and versions, they listened to feedback and have made OneView into a truly enterprise-level robust management product. It is now a far better product than the old C7000 Blade OAs, and HP SIM. It makes management of hardware easy and makes much of the maintenance easier and safer than before. For the storage side it does a great job and is intuitive to use, but the very versatility of how you can do things can lead to issues if multiple engineers do things differently.

Incentivized

• SAP Batch Job monitoring.
• File Systems
• Database Montioring

Incentivized

• Managing the overall Blade profiles and the ability to have access to all equipment from one central repository.

Incentivized

• Monitoring interface should be more user friendly.

Incentivized

• Managing the 3Pard Oneview will allow you to do things like reuse LUN IDs and setup multiple export groups with the same volume. This can cause performance issues, or worse. They could do a better job of protecting you from yourself...
• Complicated initial configuration

Incentivized

Support and training when we implemented OneView were excellent. We haven't required any additional support since we put it in and configured it for our systems. The OneView systems have been stable through updates and HPE documentation is excellent.

Incentivized

User friendly, easy to access and more detailed info during the monitoring.

Incentivized

If you are using modern HPE equipment there really are no alternatives.

Incentivized

• Biggest support in maintaining 10,000 Linux servers.

Incentivized

• No impact one way or the other for us.

Incentivized