IBM Streams vs. StreamSets DataOps Platform

Like the name says, it is good for streaming data and analyzing. It is great to look at tuples at a fast rate, filtering, calling other sources to enrich data, can call APIs, etc. Could do better for ingest use cases, can do better with guaranteed delivery, etc.

Incentivized

Majorly for all Batch and Streaming Scenarios we are designing StreamSets pipelines, few best suited and tried out use cases below : 1. JDBC to ADLS data transfer based on source refresh frequency. 2. Kafka to GCS. 3. Kafka to Azure Event. 4. Hub HDFS to ADLS data transfer. 5. Schema generation to generate Avro. The easy to design Canvas, Scheduling Jobs, Fragment creation and utilization, an inbuilt wide range of Stage availability makes it an even more favorable tool for me to design data engineering pipelines.

Incentivized

• IBM Streams is well suited for providing wire-speed real-time end-to-end processing with sub-millisecond latency.
• Streams is amazingly computationally efficient. In other words, you can typically do much more processing with a given amount of hardware than other technologies. In a recent linear-road benchmark Streams based application was able to provide greater capability than the Hadoop-based implementation using 10x less hardware. So even when latency isn't critical, using Streams might still make sense for reducing operational cost.
• Streams comes out of the box with a large and comprehensive set of tested and optimized toolkits. Leveraging these toolkits not only reduces the development time and cost but also helps reduce project risk by eliminating the need for custom code which likely has not seen as much time in test or production.
• In addition to the out of the box toolkits, there is an active developer community contributing additional specialized packages.

Incentivized

• A easy to use canvas to create Data Engineering Pipeline.
• A wide range of available Stages ie. Sources, Processors, Executors, and Destinations.
• Supports both Batch and Streaming Pipelines.
• Scheduling is way easier than cron.
• Integration with Key-Vaults for Secrets Fetching.

Incentivized

• Documentation could be more extensive, with more examples, although overall this is not too bad compared to some of the alternative solutions.
• Seems expensive to use in production.

Incentivized

• Monitoring/Visualization can be improvised and enhanced a lot (e.g. to monitor a Job to see what happened 7 days back with data transfer).
• The logging mechanism can be simplified (Logs can be filtered with "ERROR", "DEBUG", "ALL" etc but still takes some time to get familiar for understanding).
• Auto Scalability for heavy load transfer (Taking much time for >5 million record transfer from JDBC to ADLS destination in Avro file transfer).
• There should be a concept of creating Global variables which is missing.

Incentivized

There are well explained tutorials to get the user started. If you are looking for business application ideas, the user community offers a diversity of applications. It is very easy to launch applications on the cloud and can integrate with other analytic tools available on Watson Studio. It takes away the burden of the technology so that users can focus on business innovations.

Incentivized

StreamSets is a one-stop solution to design Data engineering Pipelines and doesn't require deep Programming knowledge, It's so user-friendly that anyone in Team can contribute to the Idea of pipeline design. In Hadoop One has to be programming proficient to use its various components like Hive, HDFS, Kafka, etc but in StreamSets all these stages are built-in and ready to use with minor configuration.

Incentivized

• Ability to do more with less
• Admins and data analyst can now focus on more thinking tasks
• No negative impacts yet

Incentivized

• Simplified Improvised Overall data ingestion and Integration Process.
• Support to various Hetrogenous Source systems like RDBMS< Kafka, Salesforce, Key Vault.
• Secure, easy to launch Integration tool.

Incentivized