Infovista TEMS™ Suite vs. Tuskr

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Infovista TEMS™ Suite
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
The TEMS™ Suite comprises a range of solutions designed to assess and resolve network issues from the viewpoint of subscribers. The solution helps to drive faster 5G time-to-market with lab testing, initial tuning, cluster acceptance and troubleshooting; network validation with drive, walk and drone testing; OTT voice and App testing capabilities; improves competitor benchmarking efficiency with automation and orchestration capabilities. The TEMS™ portfolio…N/A
Tuskr
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Tuskr is a cloud-based test management software. Users can manage test cases, conduct test runs and integrate with bug and time tracking tools. Tuskr is available via a free plan, and with a 30-day free trial of paid tier features.
$45
per month 5 users (minimum)
Pricing
Infovista TEMS™ SuiteTuskr
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Team
$9
per month per user
Business
$15
per month per user
Enterprise
$29
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Infovista TEMS™ SuiteTuskr
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details16% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Infovista TEMS™ SuiteTuskr
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Infovista TEMS™ SuiteTuskr
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
Infovista TEMS™ Suite
9.1
1 Ratings
12% above category average
Tuskr
9.7
20 Ratings
19% above category average
Centralized test management9.11 Ratings9.819 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
Map tests to user stories9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
Test execution reporting9.11 Ratings9.720 Ratings
Defect management9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Infovista TEMS™ SuiteTuskr
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.7 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.7 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.7 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Infovista TEMS™ SuiteTuskr
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(1 ratings)
9.9
(21 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Infovista TEMS™ SuiteTuskr
Likelihood to Recommend
InfoVista
Infovista TEMS™ Suite is very good for different scenarios like : - Cluster acceptance - Network troubleshooting - Performance validation I don`t have yet in mind a scenario which the Infovista TEMS™ Suite is not well suited, but if you have something in mind please feel free to tell me as well.
Read full review
Celoxis
Customizing fields and sorting make test case management easy to handle. The TCM's swift menu adjustments and dynamic graphs enhance the user experience, making it a delight to use.Few points which I do not dislike as such but can be improved. One is the ability to write longer tests. Another thing is that the UI when it comes to modifications like adding a new field, editing a field, etc requires few clicks and the path is slightly ambiguous.
Read full review
Pros
InfoVista
No answers on this topic
Celoxis
  • Its easy to import test cases in Tuskr by using the csv import feature
  • Test runs are easy to create and can include test cases from multiple suits.
  • Reports of test runs make it easier to track all the cases that were covered at a particular instance before giving a release signoff.
Read full review
Cons
InfoVista
No answers on this topic
Celoxis
  • When you click into a specific test, the status automatically clears. it would be nice for this to be preserved when clicking in instead of clearing
  • It would be nice to be able to add comments specific to certain steps in each test, instead of just one big comment box
  • Since we use Tuskr for QA, we structure it as a table with instructions and expected results. because these are side by side, sometimes it is hard to go in a step-by-step order when there are multiple QA steps to take to complete the test.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
InfoVista
No answers on this topic
Celoxis
Tuskr suits our organization needs
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
InfoVista
In comparison with the competition they are better. Faster and more reliable, easy to do analysis with it and it provides lots of easy to use functionalities
Read full review
Celoxis
I have not worked with related testing suite before but Tuskr has been the favorite platform for running test suites. It has generated positive leads from the company data by offering the necessary testing support. It is easy to integrate with other applications to suit business demands. The system generate results from various testing suites that can shared with our clients.
Read full review
Return on Investment
InfoVista
No answers on this topic
Celoxis
  • Make the process to create tests a lot smoother, so increase production value by reducing bugs released to customers.
  • Learning curves hinders some progress at the beginning.
  • Pricing is great for a small team, worth it with 30 days trial as well.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Infovista TEMS™ Suite Screenshots

Screenshot of Infovista TEMS Cloud DashboardScreenshot of Infovista TEMS Investigation dashboardScreenshot of TEMS Pocket BackpackScreenshot of TEMS PocketScreenshot of TEMS Paragon

Tuskr Screenshots

Screenshot of Progress MonitoringScreenshot of Create Flexible test casesScreenshot of Distribute Workload