Spot by NetApp vs. ProsperOps

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Spot by NetApp
Score 6.4 out of 10
N/A
Spot by NetApp, now including CloudCheckr, helps companies to run their cloud investments. The Spot product suite uses machine learning and analytics to automate and optimize cloud infrastructure, to ensure that workloads and applications always have the best possible infrastructure that is available, scalable and available at the lowest possible cost. Spot’s technology provides insights into cloud costs, recommendations for how to optimize utilization and costs, and automation to implement…N/A
ProsperOps
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
ProsperOps is a fully autonomous cost optimization solution for Amazon Web Services (AWS) that helps organizations save money and manage risk. It aims to help customers increase their Effective Savings Rate by an average of 68%, returning material dollars back to their cloud budgets. At the same time, ProsperOps can reduce risk by aligning commitment timelines and shrinking term length. Using real-time telemetry from the user's cloud environment, ProsperOps…N/A
Pricing
Spot by NetAppProsperOps
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Spot by NetAppProsperOps
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Spot by NetAppProsperOps
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons
Features
Spot by NetAppProsperOps
Cloud Management
Comparison of Cloud Management features of Product A and Product B
Spot by NetApp
9.0
1 Ratings
4% above category average
ProsperOps
-
Ratings
Cloud Management Security9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Automation and Orchestration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Management Performance Monitoring9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Governance and Compliance9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Systems Integration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Spot by NetAppProsperOps
Small Businesses
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Rubrik
Rubrik
Score 8.7 out of 10
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Spot by NetAppProsperOps
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(3 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Spot by NetAppProsperOps
Likelihood to Recommend
NetApp
CloudCheckr is fantastic for those that are purely in the Cloud as it provides everything you need under one roof for a comprehensive configuration and usage monitoring tool. It has SysLog capabilities though so you can farm out the alerts into a SIEM or other log management system, so hybrid environments could also benefit from its use.
Read full review
ProsperOps
Our firm spends the majority of its cloud budget on EC2 instances, Fargate deployments, and Lambda executions. Automated modifications to discount portfolios based on changes in workloads allow ProsperOops to handle our shifting workloads with ease. In order to meet our net cloud budget requirements, it always follows a high-quality SP (Savings Plan) Portfolio management strategy.
Read full review
Pros
NetApp
  • Detailed Best Practices. It's important to align your cloud to industry best practices for security and cost—it just performs better if it's used the way it's meant to be used. AWS is very flexible, and that's great when you have special requirements, but you've got to at least know when you're using something in a non-standard way so you can think through the implications.
  • Cost Reduction. Some recommendations are almost impossible to make at least for our setup, but many, many others are easy. We only have to log into CloudCheckr every few months and make a few changes for it to more than pay for itself.
  • Right-Sizing. This is related to the other points, but for some reason is separate from their cost module. The metrics it's able to pull only tell half the story, so it's good to verify it's sizing recommendations before making changes. But it does show you what instances to focus on first, and even if you choose a slightly different size to move it to, it does clearly indicate it's current size isn't appropriate. And this works both ways, if the size is too big, you can save some cash by making it smaller, but if it's too small, you want to be sure to scale up before you run into performance problems.
Read full review
ProsperOps
  • The arbitrage strategy is effective. It's hard to believe how good the service is.
  • It is a plug-and-forget approach for ProsperOps.
  • It costs ProsperOps a percentage of the savings they make.
Read full review
Cons
NetApp
  • CloudCheckr features have a tendency to break without warning. Functionality in place for months could suddenly stop working.
  • CloudCheckr support often delays work on support tickets for fixing broken application functionality.
  • The CloudCheckr platform and documentation website often crash or experience performance degradation.
  • CloudCheckr cost reporting is often impacted by faulty code or broken report functionality. This can contribute to a low level of confidence in CloudCheckr's ability to deliver accurate cost reporting.
Read full review
ProsperOps
  • The inclusion of RDS and Elasticache in cost management is something I'd be all for.
  • When it comes to EC2 capacity reservations, ProsperOps only includes reserved instances in the region where we are located.
Read full review
Usability
NetApp
Overall, CloudCheckr covers all our AWS monitoring needs and great integration through SysLog into our SIEM to capture alerts for investigation. The reports are great and allow for an easy daily review. Small improvements could be made to the interface and better filtering in places would be good. Great product and the price is fair.
Read full review
ProsperOps
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
NetApp
Fantastic Support team who are responsive and address question and concerns promptly with a thorough explanation and fast resolution.
Read full review
ProsperOps
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
NetApp
There are a few products out there that'll do an aspect or two of what CloudCheckr does, but I honestly couldn't find anything nearly as comprehensive as CloudCheckr.
Read full review
ProsperOps
To see the aggregated costs on AWS billings, we may purchase the service through AWS Marketplace instead of viewing it in ProsperOps' dashboard. Now that we're using it for AWS, we're talking with our clients about adding it to Microsoft Azure, too, so that we can make use of the tool's cloud cost control and visibility capabilities.
Read full review
Return on Investment
NetApp
  • CloudCheckr has allowed us to increase resell margins as an MSP.
  • CloudCheckr has made us aware of cost savings opportunities that exceed the price of the platform itself.
  • CloudCheckr has given us additional visibility that has allowed us to manage and understand cloud computing costs.
Read full review
ProsperOps
  • Our Effective Savings Rate has risen since we started using ProsperOps.
  • Our AWS bill savings will cover the cost of the service.
  • As much as 95.4% of our compute on-demand costs are covered by ProsperOps, and all of the savings are put to good use.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ProsperOps Screenshots

Screenshot of