Top Rated
72 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.2 out of 100
2 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 9.8 out of 100

Attribute Ratings

  • Workspace ONE Intelligence for Consumer Apps is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

Likelihood to Recommend

8.0

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

80%
22 Ratings
9.8

Workspace ONE Intelligence for Consumer Apps

98%
2 Ratings

Usability

7.3

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

73%
1 Rating

Workspace ONE Intelligence for Consumer Apps

N/A
0 Ratings

Likelihood to Recommend

Splunk

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is well suited for any complicated environment where you have apps and servers across multiple clouds and platforms and products. If you have a data centre where all your apps and servers are in one single network, you could probably get away with older solutions. But for any modern, complex, hybrid-cloud microservices environment, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is a must-have.
Read full review

VMware

Crittercism is best as a bread crumb trail, stack track logging service to debug applications when you have an issue detecting a problem in your application. Its strength is not as a real-time logging platform to allow you to view production logs in real-time. However, it would be an extremely beneficial feature for Crittercism to add.
Read full review

Pros

Splunk

  • SignalFX handles historical metric aggregation exceptionally well, providing a multifaceted approach to event detection based on anomalies.
  • SignalFX's cost is incredibly flexible with their pricing model of DPM (data-point per minute) vs the traditional "per host" model that most monitoring SaaS use.
  • SignalFX support is responsive and knowledgeable, very eager to help solve your immediate problems.
  • SignalFX integrations is vast and constantly growing, making adoption easy even when multiple different open-source technologies are used in your stack.
Read full review

VMware

  • Identifying crashes users are experiencing.
  • Allowing us to see how many times the crash occurred.
  • Allowing us to see what times the crashes have occurred.
Read full review

Cons

Splunk

  • Better integration with our clients (native mobile clients SDKs will be great).
  • A way to easily tag filters and move them across metrics/formula.
  • Alert system to easy false [alarm] and hard to configure.
  • Be able to have group more dimensions (and have more values on each).
Read full review

VMware

  • Pointing to exact line number of the crash
  • A more explicit navigation bar (a little confusing for the user)
  • Third-party API specific crash reporting (instead of just listing the endpoint)
Read full review

Pricing Details

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

Starting Price

$15 per month

Editions & Modules

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring editions and modules pricing
EditionModules

Footnotes

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    Pricing

    Workspace ONE Intelligence for Consumer Apps

    Starting Price

    Editions & Modules

    Workspace ONE Intelligence for Consumer Apps editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules

    Footnotes

      Offerings

      Free Trial
      Free/Freemium Version
      Premium Consulting/Integration Services

      Entry-level set up fee?

      No setup fee

      Additional Details

      Usability

      Splunk

      I find that learning the interface can take some time. We need a better show-and-tell on how the Teams pages, Dashboard Groups, Dashboards and charts delay. Advance SignalFlow is sometimes hard to build. Some better samples of advanced SignalFlow would be helpful. For example, Splunk SPL has a vast resource of examples.
      Read full review

      VMware

      No answers on this topic

      Alternatives Considered

      Splunk

      They’re not for the same purpose but we’re using NewRelic and Honeycomb for monitoring purposes. NewRelic is used for HTTP client monitoring for system related throughput, error, database and external client monitoring. Honeycomb is used to monitor actual HTTP request/response values. Splunk [Infrastructure Monitoring] is used for real-time application related throughout and error monitoring.
      Read full review

      VMware

      A similar product we use is Conviva. I personally prefer Crittercism as Conviva seems to miss things fairly often. Critter tends to catch most issues as long as development has set the app up for it. I've had to reproduce issues several times before Conviva catches it whereas Crittercism will catch it on the first try
      Read full review

      Return on Investment

      Splunk

      • It has improved the Service Level Agreement.
      • The response time to resolve the issue has been decreased exponentially.
      • There is a new resolution category now i.e. zero call resolution which is a result of the AI-driven feature that helps resolve things before they really occur.
      Read full review

      VMware

      • Allow us to release iOS versions quicker to the app store
      • Help us solve bugs and view bread crumb trails on money-making actions within the API
      • Points us to problems in the stack trace with a direct correlation to our route creation aspect in the app
      Read full review

      Screenshots

      Add comparison