Splunk User Behavior Analytics (UBA) vs. Symantec Content & Malware Analysis

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Splunk User Behavior Analytics (UBA)
Score 5.6 out of 10
N/A
Splunk supplies security analytics as a standalone solution or priced as an add-on for users of its popular SIEM products, to protect enterprises against unknown threats and malicious behavior, via the Splunk User Behavior Analytics (UBA) application.N/A
Symantec Content & Malware Analysis
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Symantec Content & Malware Analysis is an application which provides advanced threat detection and threat hunting through advanced machine learning, based on intelligence gathered from ProxySG, threat intelligence services, and other sources.N/A
Pricing
Splunk User Behavior Analytics (UBA)Symantec Content & Malware Analysis
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Splunk User Behavior Analytics (UBA)Symantec Content & Malware Analysis
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Splunk User Behavior Analytics (UBA)Symantec Content & Malware Analysis
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Splunk User Behavior Analytics (UBA)Symantec Content & Malware Analysis
Small Businesses
ActivTrak
ActivTrak
Score 8.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ActivTrak
ActivTrak
Score 8.8 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Darktrace
Darktrace
Score 8.7 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Splunk User Behavior Analytics (UBA)Symantec Content & Malware Analysis
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Splunk User Behavior Analytics (UBA)Symantec Content & Malware Analysis
Likelihood to Recommend
Splunk
Splunk User Behavior Analytics application is necessary when any company wants to capture the threat based on user behavior instead of just counting the number of occurrences of particular event. With Splunk UBA, we can analyse number of anomalies captured and which in turn creating threats which are nearly true positive.
Read full review
Broadcom
If you have Symantec based environment including Symantec proxy and endpoints, Content and Malware Analysis is the obvious choice. You can't run the CAS-MAS as a standalone deployment, you need proxies or ICAP supported devices capable to send the files/URLS. It's not a network security device where you can flow/direct the traffic to C/MAS. It does not have UBA, NBA or NTR features, it is just working for analyzing files as expected.
Read full review
Pros
Splunk
  • Monitor and troubleshoot for any system errors.
  • Get the insights on application data sets and do some predictive analysis.
Read full review
Broadcom
  • 0 day detection and prevenion
  • Flawless integration with Symantec Ecosystem
  • Integration with other vendors supporting ICAP is also working
  • Custom and golden image support
  • High performance on busy environments
  • Many threats are already detected and prevented through the CAS, it improves the performance drastically.
  • Already builtin virustotal integration
  • Reference to updates and updates information where I can see the product/service detecting which APTs
  • Multiple Antivirus engines which you can select/subscribe
  • Manual submission of file is supported through the gui
  • URL manual submission is also supported
Read full review
Cons
Splunk
  • Performance-wise, it can be improved. Queries take a long time.
  • Dataset exploration - More data visualization charts can be added.
Read full review
Broadcom
  • API support is lacking
  • Symantec/Broadcom security vision in general
  • Symantec support is not perfect
  • You can't run the product as a standalone network device
  • No packet capture capabiliy or work in span mode
  • You need a dedicated hardware to make it run
  • You need to buy
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Splunk
Easier we were using Splunk Enterprise on heavy forwarder on which all the add-on were installed and were using Splunk Cloud with respect to search head and indexers stack. And with Splunk Enterprise Security premium app, we were relying on correlation rules which were throwing more number of false positive but after implementing Splunk UBA, we are now getting real-time true positive threat or incidents.
Read full review
Broadcom
We have been using many solutions even tested nearly all available 0day sandbox solutions in the market. We choose Symantec CMA as we have already Symantec endpoint protection/EDR on the client, Symantec proxy for the web access, SCMA fits our environment. We have a big bargain when we puchase lots of equipment from the Symantec. Detection and prevention is very good at SCMA but some constant issues; like the product is not designed for heterogeneous environments, we can not integrate the SCMA with WAFs, it's lacking in api and request/reply calls. There's no file scanning, discover the option. SIEM integration is not smooth. I can not run some of the SOAR playbooks through the SCMA.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Splunk
  • Fewer team members to work on real threats.
  • Less time required to deal with real incidents.
  • Easy to implement across the network.
Read full review
Broadcom
  • 0-day and APT risk is covered by the SCMA
  • As the SSL is inspected and analyzed at Bluecoat proxy servers, hidden threats, malicous files are passed to SCMA to be analyzed.
  • Getting full visibility at file trajectory level
  • As it's a full proxy and ICAP integration, we are sure that the files are to analyzed and scanned for malicious activity. This is a big plus compared to NGFW analyze concept, as the NGFWs have special failsafe mechanisms allowing bypass of file analysis. SCMA fully catches the hidden threats.
  • Flawless integration with Bluecoat systems is a big plus, customers are getting the same type of messages within their browsers.
  • A negative impact is the standardization when I deploy SCAM to one of our locations. Then the auditors demand the same coverage within other areas and it comes with the cost. Especially maintaining these devices on premise environment has a significant cost.
Read full review
ScreenShots