Cradlepoint NetCloud SD-WAN: More than always-on VPN services
Overall Satisfaction with Cradlepoint NetCloud (formerly Pertino)
We use Cradlepoint NetCloud because of the high mobility of our workforce between our 56 different offices and the many offsite visits our staff do as part of their jobs. We install the agent on every laptop and even on desktop in remote offices in the organization to create a virtual WAN, emulating a hub and spoke WAN with SmartZones, so that each user has access to corporate resources from wherever they are. We use any Internet connection to get seamless access.
Pros
- SD-WAN connectivity
- Granular Manageability
- Internal DNS resolution
- Virtual IP Address Management
- Site-based access rules
Cons
- Their support could be quicker
- Always-on connectivity
- SmartZones
- Agent-based management
- TCO vs traditional WAN was over 1,000% less
- Increased connectivity improved security AND connectivity
The cost of equipment, lines, and services was over 1,000 times the five year cost of Cradlepoint (formerly Pertino) when looking for a complete WAN replacement. Using small Linux devices (Intel NUCs) instead of expensive networking hardware provided equal service levels when we needed passthrough site-based access, rather than buying specific hardware from a vendor (including even Cradlepoint, though the integration is great and I do recommend their devices - especially for their cellular data redundancy features)
Do you think Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine's feature set?
Yes
Did Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation