Hyper-V is awesome
October 09, 2015

Hyper-V is awesome

Lee Weers | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Software Version

2008 and 2012r2

Overall Satisfaction with Hyper-V

We have 6 Hyper-V hosts and over 100 VMs. Most of the VMs are a Microsoft operating system from 2003 to 2012r2 and Windows 7, 8 and 10 for the vdi environment. We also have several Linux guests as well. We are migrating from 2008r2 hosts to a 2012r2 cluster. It has served us very well and saved the college thousands of dollars a year in software costs. We do use Virtual Machine Manager to manage the virtual environment and we will be implementing Hyper-V replicas for business continuity in the near future.

  • It is easy to get started.
  • If you are a Microsoft shop, you have to buy the server OS licenses any way and it saves the other hypervisor costs.
  • It works and just continues to run.
  • Permissions to individual VMs in a large environment can be difficult to get set up properly.
  • Third party integration is still developing.
  • Would like to see a broader adoption.
  • Cost avoidance
  • Faster Server OS migrations
  • Reduced downtime
  • Reduced RTO
We compared Hyper-V beta with VMware and Hyper-V had all of the features we needed at the time. As our virtual environment has grown so has Hyper-V's capabilities. If you have to buy the OS license anyway, why pay more for the virtualization platform as well? That is what VMware never understood. For us there are no longer any features that are missing from Hyper-V.
I have not found too many situations that Hyper-V is not a fit. It is great to get started with a test/dev environment to get familiar with it then start rolling it out to production. I like being able to just copy the virtual hard disk (VHD) from my desktop to the server and turn it on.

Hyper-V Feature Ratings

Virtual machine automated provisioning
8
Management console
10
Live virtual machine backup
10
Live virtual machine migration
10
Hypervisor-level security
8