Amazon Timestream vs. Apache Druid

Amazon Timestream

Amazon Timestream

3 Reviews and Ratings

Apache Druid

3 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Amazon Timestream	Score 9.1 out of 10	N/A	Amazon AWS offers the Timestream managed time-series database service.	N/A
Druid	Score 8.8 out of 10	N/A	Apache Druid is an open source distributed data store. Druid’s core design combines ideas from data warehouses, timeseries databases, and search systems to create a high performance real-time analytics database for a broad range of use cases. Druid merges key characteristics of each of the 3 systems into its ingestion layer, storage format, querying layer, and core architecture.	N/A

Pricing

Amazon Timestream

Apache Druid

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Amazon Timestream	Druid
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Amazon Timestream	Apache Druid
Top Pros	Pro Data access Pro Highly scalable Pro Highly reliable	No answers on this topic
Top Cons	Minus End user Minus User documentation Minus Quick start	No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
	Amazon Timestream	Apache Druid
Small Businesses	InfluxDB Score 8.5 out of 10	InfluxDB Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
Enterprises	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Amazon Timestream	Apache Druid
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Amazon Timestream	Apache Druid
Likelihood to Recommend	Amazon AWS No answers on this topic	Apache It is extremely well suited to rapid ingest of data from large data sources, due to the fact that you can restrict what is ingested by column/field, so that you only pull in the data you actually want or need. As stated earlier, the open source version could use better cluster management tools, and troubleshooting tools for failing jobs/tasks. Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Amazon AWS No answers on this topic	Apache Rapid ingest Limiting ingest to only the relevant fields/columns Easy ingest spec creation Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Amazon AWS No answers on this topic	Apache Security configuration is problematic Cluster management could have more features Troubleshooting incomplete tasks/jobs is a chore Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Amazon AWS No answers on this topic	Apache Integration with S3 storage has saved about 35% on our storage, over HDFS The rapid ingest has saved user's time in the query aspects of their applications. The ability to ingest from a variety of data sources has made overall user application queries much simpler Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots