AutomationNG vs. Zephyr Enterprise

AutomationNG is best suited for people with no programming language at all. It is easy to write tests and execute. Cross browser testing feature is the best part of this app. Cross browser testing can be tricky in other tools, but this app handles it very graciously. However, the tests are executed slowly compared to other tools like selenium but that requires programming knowledge

Incentivized

1. Well suited for companies having several applications which need rigorous continuous testing cycles due to periodic upgrades to products/features.
2. Ideally suited for use cases where there is a need to run sanity and regression suites very frequently.
3. It is very helpful to have a traceability matrix across Stories/tasks and easy to link all the test cases to be covered to stories.
4. Variety of reports for Quality Dashboard.

Incentivized

• Doesnt require any programming knowledge
• Test cases are written in simple English-like
• Cross browser testing is supported and is easy to perform
• Integration with Jira
• Takes significantly less time to write test scripts

Incentivized

• Creation of Folders, Sub Folder and Releases for various Teams/Projects
• Ability to create cycles and adding cases to these
• Ability to copy/clone entire test cycles for regression/sanity needs
• Linking of defects to Test Cases

Incentivized

• UI is pretty outdated and needs major revamp
• Test results UI can be improved
• Speed of automation can be improved

Incentivized

• Better Test case Upload Utility
• Ability to quickly map test cases from excel to JIRA fields

Incentivized

Incentivized

• Easy to write the test cases hence saves lot of time.
• Helps us to manage the tests and identify bugs quite early
• Cross browser testing is a major feature

Incentivized

• Time saving and productivity enhancement for QA teams by preventing context and tool switching
• High observability to management via QA Dashboards

Incentivized