Avigilon Access Control Manager (ACM) vs. SALTO Systems

There are simpler systems out there for card access. The simpler systems are not as granular. There a lot of card access pieces to ACM. ACM also requires a server so if you want a cloud based solution, this is not an option. It's best if you have staff or a local company to support the hardware and software.

Incentivized

With the responsibility of securing a hospital, SALTO performs well. We have all but one public entrance completely secured by badge access only. This eliminates a lot of threats to our employees, our patients, and visitors to Republic County Hospital. SALTO helps provide peace of mind.

Incentivized

• Integrate with burg systems
• Granular for time access
• Flexible with many types of badges

Incentivized

• Security
• Access tracking
• Data storage

Incentivized

• How you set up integration with burg systems
• SSO
• Making door double taps easier to set up

Incentivized

• I don't have any negative experiences with SALTO.
• I have no suggestions for improvement.
• I can't think of any recommendations for change.

Incentivized

Some systems out there are not too granular. They also lacked integration with Google, which we need. With that being said ACM can sometimes make setup too complicated. Double-tap cards for instance take many steps to set up. In other systems it's a one-click setup. ACM is also compatible with Mercury boards. This is a big reason to choose ACM because the boards are not proprietary.

Incentivized

• card access can help to limit physical keys
• Less staff to unlock doors for events, because now they are scheduled by one person
• Licensing and installation costs are pricey

Incentivized

• N/A
• N/A
• N/A

Incentivized