Azuga Fleet vs. GFI Systems

Azuga Fleet is good for small or large companies alike. A very effective way to track the fleet and drivers.

Incentivized

When a company wants a single platform that handles all security scanning and evaluation. I would also suggest to a small to medium-sized company that wants a patch management and security vulnerability tool that isn't going to break the bank.

Incentivized

• Reporting (breadcrumb trail, speed, etc.)
• Vehicle location overview
• Route deviation and route timeliness
• Ease of use

Incentivized

• Security is their main focus and they do an excellent job providing users the ability to use all tools in one product.
• Their reports are very detailed and have the option to auto email key people with executive reports to keep track of vulnerabilities and patch status.
• Keeping costs low, no other company could offer as much as they do for everything they offer.

Incentivized

• Reporting functions could be better.

Incentivized

• Their agentless patch management could offer realtime status of when a patch fails, or completes.
• Their 3rd party patching inventory could be larger.
• Patches that are released should be vetted prior to release unless its a critical or important patch.

Incentivized

If/when we have an issue, they have been very timely in assisting us.

Incentivized

The Support zteam for GFI was with us all the way through, and I believe that they had the best support team of all the products that we use and/or tested.

Incentivized

Azuga Fleet is much more user friendly. The information is the same, but Azuga Fleet delivers that information in a much easier and more logical way. The reporting functionality of Azuga Fleet is so much better than GeoTab--easier to access, easier to read, and just better overall. The only feature that GeoTab has is the school bus capability. But, it is also a much more difficult install. For the majority of our vehicles, the easy plugin install of Azuga Fleet is all we need.

Incentivized

Of the two others in the list that we compared to GFI offers the same capabilities that the other two do but that it's also a security suite for the same price and product. The other two offer everything that GFI does but for a higher cost. Ivanti had a live update on the status of patch deployments which is something we wanted. Qualis does not offer agentless patching or scanning. We use Qualis for other purposes so it was considered.

Incentivized

• [Azuga Fleet] has saved us time and money by allowing us to direct or redirect technician to job thus making customers appreciate our timely services.
• [Azuga Fleet] has [reduced] communication needs for dispatch to find a techs location. Less time on the phone and more production.

Incentivized

• GFI was on par with other patching software but offered more tools. In that, it was a great value.
• we chose a different software that was more inline with our needs, as we didn't need everything that GFI offered. GFI was our runner up.
• GFI gets the job done, there is no question about that. I would suggest any company to at least continue with a POC.

Incentivized