Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is designed to make deploying and managing containerized applications easy. It offers serverless Kubernetes, an integrated continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) experience, and enterprise-grade security and governance. It allows development and operations teams on a single platform to rapidly build, deliver, and scale applications with confidence.N/A
Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes is an enterprise Kubernetes solution for multi-cloud operations. Ubuntu is the reference platform for Kubernetes on all major public clouds. Canonical Kubernetes is built on Ubuntu and aims to combine security with optimal price-performance. Canonical's cloud-native automation framework ensures developer productivity and business innovation.N/A
Pricing
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.3 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
At one instance, there was a fire in our data center and the backup power had some issues because of which the whole DC went down. I believe with AKS and the replication it's easier to handle such a situation. Also, the scenario would have been pretty transparent to the end-users.
Read full review
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
Pros
Microsoft
  • Highly repeatable process
  • Minimizes the amount of software to install
  • Easily scale resources to meet demand
Read full review
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
Cons
Microsoft
  • Need to update cluster manually
  • Policies cannot be updated for existing components
  • if any change in policy every has to create cluster
Read full review
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Microsoft support was really good, whenever we raise any ticket they come back to us within a couple of hours.
Read full review
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
The ability to create new instances (i.e. elastic provisioning) is probably the fastest with Azure Kubernetes Service compared to the alternatives that I have looked at. From a pricing perspective, Microsoft always seems to find a way to be more competitive in this area, and literally every other field they play in.
Read full review
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Positive impact in moving applications to cloud from the in-hose data center to save cost
  • Sometimes got affected with some bugs on the AKS infrastructure but hasn't caused a big kios as our production footprint in AKS is not yet high
Read full review
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots