Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (Discontinued) vs. NetIQ by OpenText

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (Discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Multi-Factor Authentication is the recently rebranded technology acquired with PhoneFactor in 2012. From 2018 it is no longer available as a standalone product.N/A
NetIQ by OpenText
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
NetIQ secures organizations through a comprehensive set of identity and access services for workforce and customer identities.N/A
Pricing
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (Discontinued)NetIQ by OpenText
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (Discontinued)NetIQ by OpenText
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (Discontinued)NetIQ by OpenText
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (Discontinued)NetIQ by OpenText
Small Businesses
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.0 out of 10
Dashlane
Dashlane
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.4 out of 10
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.4 out of 10
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (Discontinued)NetIQ by OpenText
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (Discontinued)NetIQ by OpenText
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
If your solution falls within their standard use case or you have Office 365 - then it makes total sense. If you need a lot of customization or have a really specific business process that causes you to deviate from the standard flow it usually makes more sense to create a custom solution
Read full review
OpenText
  • An organization who needs a way of managing their entire user lifecycle.
  • If an organization needed a solid Identity Management (IDM) solution that could do Single Sign-On (SS) and provisioning for services both internally and in the cloud.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Ease of use
  • Interoperability
  • Industry standard
Read full review
OpenText
  • Easy to use workflow for creating users.
  • The self-service portal for resetting passwords etc., is easy to deploy.
  • Has strong user activity monitoring.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • It can be difficult to work with when deviating off the standard use cases
Read full review
OpenText
  • The interface is a bit outdated.
  • It would be nice to be able to customize the self-service portal more.
  • It would be great if it integrated with more products.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Honestly, they are very similar as is much of their offerings. It really comes down to which ecosystem are you already invested in? It doesn't make a lot of sense to try and interop with every cloud vendor - pick one and use them. While there used to be substantial differences in the cloud platforms, they are at basic parity now
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Overall, it's a really good value compared to building a custom solution that you have to maintain
Read full review
OpenText
  • ROI
  • Self-Service
  • Easy Install
Read full review
ScreenShots