Backstage vs. Kong Konnect

Backstage is well suited in building developer portal or developer platform. It can be easily customized as well, so different companies can use it based on their own situation. It currently focus more on frontend, but I can see there is already a roadmap for improving backend with some core modules. After that has been introduced, it will become really powerful and save developers time to solve common problems.

Incentivized

Using Kong [Konnect]'s declarative settings, a user may control traffic, automate deployment, and maintain container-based software after it's deployed. In addition, it handles the whole lifecycle of service management. Installation, management, and operation of Kong [Konnects]'s cloud-native connection runtimes may be performed in any cloud or Kubernetes provider environment, as well as on-premises environments. In order to optimise their services and transactions, users may keep track of their services and transactions in real-time via real-time monitoring.

Incentivized

• developer portal
• easy to onboard
• easy to extend

Incentivized

• Application orchestration
• Error tracing
• Analyzing traffic
• Load balancing

Incentivized

• it may provide more modules that can solve common problems

Incentivized

• Community support
• Sample projects for easy integration

Incentivized

• It speeds up our progress on building our own developer portal
• It's free to use so very little investment

Incentivized

• Increased application efficiency
• Reduced system downtown
• Significantly improved error resolution

Incentivized