Canopy Practice Management vs. Cerner Practice Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Canopy Practice Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Canopy Practice Management is designed to help accounting firms keep all parties on the same page. It includes essential tools for enabling communication between clients and your team.N/A
Cerner Practice Management
Score 5.4 out of 10
N/A
Cerner Practice Management, formerly under the name "PowerWorks"is a software solution that enables users to manage clinic operations across registration, scheduling, patient tracking, patient accounting and reporting through one workflow.N/A
Pricing
Canopy Practice ManagementCerner Practice Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Canopy Practice ManagementCerner Practice Management
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Canopy Practice ManagementCerner Practice Management
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Canopy Practice ManagementCerner Practice Management
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Kareo Practice Management
Kareo Practice Management
Score 6.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

CareLogic EHR
CareLogic EHR
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Epic
Epic
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Canopy Practice ManagementCerner Practice Management
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
5.0
(3 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Canopy Practice ManagementCerner Practice Management
Likelihood to Recommend
Canopy, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Well suited in the clinical setting although a little tedious. Not suited in many other places.
Read full review
Pros
Canopy, Inc.
  • Client information management
  • Task tracking
  • Time Tracking
Read full review
Oracle
  • Scheduling - I personally enjoy the ease of use with the solution. It also has a great "memory" as to patient rescheduling, no shows, etc. Being able to create multiple schedules to reflect different practitioners is such a major plus in this system.
  • Customization - I am able to create Super-bills, Global Periods, and Insurance Details pertinent to each patient and not have to RECREATE them every time like I had to in past systems.
  • EOB - an added bonus is the ability for the system to check EOB ahead of time. This is a HUGE time saving in an office!
Read full review
Cons
Canopy, Inc.
  • I wish Contact information could contain active hyperlinks
  • I wish reports could be generated based on TAGS
  • I wish contact lists could be generated based on filters
Read full review
Oracle
  • Only seems applicable for small organizations.
Read full review
Performance
Canopy, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Everything within the system works smoothly, it’s just time-consuming and could be a bit more simplistic.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Canopy, Inc.
LIGHT YEARS ahead of PCS. We hated it
Read full review
Oracle
I personally would use this system over any other systems currently on the market. Athena has a nice product...however, it can be quite expensive and the colors are draining on the eyes. eClinical Works also has a system that is comparable, but the customization I found wasn't as easy as the Cerner product
Read full review
Return on Investment
Canopy, Inc.
  • Big impact on profitability based on the ability to set budgets and track time
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots