Canopy Practice Management vs. Cerner Practice Management

Well suited in the clinical setting although a little tedious. Not suited in many other places.

Incentivized

• Client information management
• Task tracking
• Time Tracking

Incentivized

• Scheduling - I personally enjoy the ease of use with the solution. It also has a great "memory" as to patient rescheduling, no shows, etc. Being able to create multiple schedules to reflect different practitioners is such a major plus in this system.
• Customization - I am able to create Super-bills, Global Periods, and Insurance Details pertinent to each patient and not have to RECREATE them every time like I had to in past systems.
• EOB - an added bonus is the ability for the system to check EOB ahead of time. This is a HUGE time saving in an office!

Incentivized

• I wish Contact information could contain active hyperlinks
• I wish reports could be generated based on TAGS
• I wish contact lists could be generated based on filters

Incentivized

• Only seems applicable for small organizations.

Incentivized

Everything within the system works smoothly, it’s just time-consuming and could be a bit more simplistic.

Incentivized

LIGHT YEARS ahead of PCS. We hated it

Incentivized

I personally would use this system over any other systems currently on the market. Athena has a nice product...however, it can be quite expensive and the colors are draining on the eyes. eClinical Works also has a system that is comparable, but the customization I found wasn't as easy as the Cerner product

Incentivized

• Big impact on profitability based on the ability to set budgets and track time

Incentivized