TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Celoxis

    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Celoxis is a Enterprise online project management solution for midsize to large businesses to help them plan and manage complex and diverse project portfolios. The collective suite includes modules for resource management, budgeting, revenue forecasting, time and expense tracking, reporting and team collaboration. Celoxis includes features such as advanced scheduling, which combines real-world conditions, such as resource time off, multi-time zone, part-time resources, working weekends etc.,…N/A

    Workamajig

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AWorkamajig is a project management system with capabilities such as file sharing, resource management, and revenue projection.

    $41

    per month per user

    Pricing
    CeloxisWorkamajig
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    In-house
    $41
    per month per user
    Agency
    $41
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    Contact
    per month per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CeloxisWorkamajig
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    CeloxisWorkamajig
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Celoxis and Workamajig
    Feature
    Celoxis
    8.3
    4 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Workamajig
    4.9
    13 Ratings
    44% below category average
    Task Management9.34 Ratings8.013 Ratings
    Resource Management7.74 Ratings5.513 Ratings
    Gantt Charts7.74 Ratings6.16 Ratings
    Scheduling8.53 Ratings5.011 Ratings
    Workflow Automation7.53 Ratings4.011 Ratings
    Team Collaboration7.44 Ratings5.013 Ratings
    Support for Agile Methodology9.01 Ratings3.07 Ratings
    Support for Waterfall Methodology10.01 Ratings3.07 Ratings
    Document Management8.02 Ratings4.013 Ratings
    Email integration9.02 Ratings5.510 Ratings
    Mobile Access6.01 Ratings1.08 Ratings
    Timesheet Tracking8.53 Ratings8.011 Ratings
    Change request and Case Management9.02 Ratings4.08 Ratings
    Budget and Expense Management8.03 Ratings7.010 Ratings
    Professional Services Automation
    Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Celoxis and Workamajig
    Feature
    Celoxis
    8.3
    4 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Workamajig
    6.7
    10 Ratings
    14% below category average
    Quotes/estimates8.53 Ratings7.07 Ratings
    Invoicing7.02 Ratings7.97 Ratings
    Project & financial reporting7.53 Ratings6.010 Ratings
    Integration with accounting software10.01 Ratings6.03 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CeloxisWorkamajig
    Small Businesses
    Any.do
    Score8 out of 10
    Any.do
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    KanbanFlow
    Score7.3 out of 10
    KanbanFlow
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Microsoft To Do
    Score7.9 out of 10
    Microsoft To Do
    Score7.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CeloxisWorkamajig
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    6.0
    (13 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CeloxisWorkamajig
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Celoxis
    Celoxis is a great option if you are looking for an affordable, easy to use, easy to integrate project manegement solution. It is very powerful for waterfall project management. I evaluated more than 15 platforms and could not find any with a close evaluation in terms of cost-benefit to Celoxis. Of course there are more powerfull tools, for 10 times the price. So far, for project management, there hasn't been a requirement I haven't been able to solve with some work. It really lacks features for Agile methodologies, even if it provides a Kanban view, so far it doesn't provide and additional agile artifacts. If an organization has already reached a very mature project management practice and needs to improve on program and portfolio management, Celoxis won't provide any useful feature. If the organization has the resources (skills and time mostly) to develop some workflows and customization, it might work but with a limit. Hopefully Celoxis addresses these features in the near future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Workamajig
    If you're looking for a system to help you address accounting that's not suited for marketing agency structures, this is the right tool. It is a bit cumbersome, but it has streamlined our reporting, billing, estimating, and tracking. As for project management, it's great that it integrates with the estimating and finances, but it's just not enjoyable to use. The interface is clunky. So if project management is your main criteria, I'd choose something else. We would never use it to collaborate with clients either because I'd be afraid of making them frustrated by the tool, so we use Basecamp to do that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Celoxis
    • Project planning
    • Time log
    • Efforts analysis vs plan
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Workamajig
    • The Platinum version has a particularly robust time tracking system, down to a 'timer' function that can be critical for an agency like mine where you want to be accountable for billing a client arruately
    • The ability to make projects available only to those who are permitted to assign their time to it has apparently been very helpful during our revenue reconciliation meetings where time incurred is reviewed against scope
    • The mobile app, while I still feel needs some work, is pretty handy for a quick calendar check if I'm in a client meeting and cannot utilize my browser to get information
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Celoxis
    • Support is at times slow to respond.
    • Not new user-friendly.
    • Not able to pull in closer or zoom the interface.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Workamajig
    • WMJ's interface is dated. Despite an html5 driven "sheets"-based interface, it takes a lot of time and effort to manage the interface, which could be streamlined considerably. On a UX/UI scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, WMJ would earn a 6 from me.
    • Despite the amount of documentation available, there is a distinct lack of clarity in that documentation, and it doesn't fully cover everything you would expect. Branching thoughts, for instance, are not addressed. Additionally, because there are two editions of the software online, there are two support sites that aren't sequestered. So information from both commingles, creating confusion.
    • Support is available on an email and phone basis. They strongly encourage you to use email, however, and they are resistant to phone time. This is likely because the support staff is limited in number, but has a great depth of knowledge. If you want immediate phone support, however, YOU ARE OUT OF LUCK. You are placed in a queue and the odds of same-day help are low. For email, the response is usually within an hour, but when you are stuck with a configuration issue, or need to generate a report and don't know how to do something, waiting is not optimal. That said, the support team is TERRIFIC.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Celoxis
    I used an evalaution matrix built with input of several stakeholders in the company. In the end the matrix included 100 features (non of them was price related). The matrix was heavily focused on waterfall project management, agile related features were only 5 out of 100 features. Features were labeled as mandatory, required or optional. Products which lacked a mandatory feature (like providing technical support) were disqualified. Then a price vs features evaluation was made and only the products with the best combination were seleced to continue: Celoxis, ITM Platform and Mission Control. A final technical evaluation was made comparing the full evaluation but also the evaluation of only the 40 required features. Overall, Celoxis was the better evaluated (76% vs 65% of the second place), for the 40 required features, Celoxis got 91% against 78% of number 2. In the end we chose Celoxis even when it had higher licensing cost.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Workamajig
    Workamajig was selected over a decade ago when there were very few project management platforms that has integrations with other platforms, support for Agile, KanBan, etc etc. Most of the other offerings did not offer the type of security available with us hosting an on premises server behind a VPN although now there are plenty of cloud based solutions that have security compliance greater than what we can provide (fedRamp, etc.)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Celoxis
    • Positive in most cases
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Workamajig
    • The agency switched to an hourly allocation so our clients were subject to a certain amount of hours each quarter. JIG helped us keep track of who was going over hours or who had some to spare. Once the clients went over we would use JIG to help charge the additional fees for going over. It helped keep clients accountable.
    • It was used to keep track of time sheets and through those time sheets, the directors were able to make a case for more employees on certain accounts. The corporate team hired 3 additional people that were truly needed and our time sheets helped reflect that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Celoxis Screenshots

    Screenshot of Celoxis DashboardScreenshot of Gantt chartScreenshot of WorkloadScreenshot of TimesheetScreenshot of Resource ManagementProduct screenshot