Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service vs. Red Hat CodeReady Workspaces

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service (IIS) is an infrastructure lifecycle management solution that helps IT operations teams manage their compute, storage, and networking infrastructure—wherever it is—all from one place. Designed for Cisco UCS and HyperFlex customers, Cisco IIS simplifies infrastructure management to help teams deliver outstanding digital experiences. IIS can be used to operate with consistency and control, strengthen an organization's security posture, and increase…N/A
Red Hat CodeReady Workspaces
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat CodeReady Workspaces uses Kubernetes and containers to provide any member of the development or IT team with a consistent, secure, and zero-configuration development environment. It is the next stage of the former Codenvy.io, owned and supported by Red Hat since the May 2017 acquisition, which was presented as a customizable containerized developer workspace that handles provisioning, scaling, and stopping.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceRed Hat CodeReady Workspaces
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceRed Hat CodeReady Workspaces
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceRed Hat CodeReady Workspaces
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceRed Hat CodeReady Workspaces
Small Businesses
HashiCorp Terraform
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.6 out of 10
HashiCorp Terraform
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Ansible
Ansible
Score 8.9 out of 10
Ansible
Ansible
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Ansible
Ansible
Score 8.9 out of 10
Ansible
Ansible
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceRed Hat CodeReady Workspaces
Likelihood to Recommend
7.5
(23 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.5
(22 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
8.4
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
8.5
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Intersight Infrastructure ServiceRed Hat CodeReady Workspaces
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
Cisco Intersight is very well suited for doing firmware upgrades across all of your cisco hardware. So far we have had no problems pushing out new firmware. It's also well suited for hardware management. Cisco TAC has the ability to pull logs for the IMC for themselves, which saves you from having to pull the logs yourself and then uploading them to the case. It may or may not be appropriate for upgrading operating systems. I have not been able to test it.
Read full review
Red Hat
We have a team of 500 people so it's most reliable and scalable if any new joinees. That way user's can directly create their own workspace and start working and share the work stack throughout development teams securely, to update and modify any upcoming events. The best thing about Red Hat Workspace is it's simple, with all Runtime libraries pre-installed, so no need to request a platform from Azure or any other platform provider just log in and start creating a workspace. It has version control so can easily import GIT projects can start work without worrying we don't have Java, Python or any other platform not installed just select the platform needed and start working.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Ease of implementation of our UCS-X Platforms
  • Ease of Management
  • Cross visibility to our Data Center Infrastructure (Network, Storage, Compute)
  • Ability to Automate our configurations
  • Ability to create profiles for better consistency and standardization
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Cons
Cisco
  • Interface is quite slow
  • Interface tree (navigating between server, profile, blade, chassis, FI, etc) is counterintuitive and needs more links in the tree
  • Deploying minor changes takes much longer than in UCSM or UCSC
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Can improve UI like Visual studio so that VS user's can switch without any difficulty.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
We use it every single day and love the ease of it and the integration of all our servers
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cisco
Usability of Cisco Intersight is highly dependent on the licensing purchased. The default (free) license level provides a lot of value for the minimal amount of effort to implement. The paid license levels provide additional features (detailed inventory, configuration management and deployment, etc.)
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cisco
Support for this platform is unmatched. I've used only a couple of other platforms, honestly, but Cisco Intersight's support system really works, and they do a great job. Any issue I've had was solved in a timely manner with a polite representative who cared about helping me and not just plainly reading off of a script that doesn't actually help. I rate it well.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
I personally think that Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service is at the top of its class when it comes to managing data center hardware. The cloud-connected design feels very modern and easy to use. The mobile app is something I wouldn't expect to get in a server management tool. The way it can update, monitor, and manage our servers is very nice. Overall, we are very happy with it.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • It is positive for a few people being able to manage a lot of hardware
  • It does put the management in the cloud, which some could argue is a security vulnerability.
  • It is difficult to move hardware from Intersign managed to standalone.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • No need to request for any platform again and again.
Read full review
ScreenShots