Cisco Meraki vMX vs. Norton Secure VPN

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Meraki vMX
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Cisco's Meraki Virtual MX (vMX) is a virtual instance of a Meraki security & SD-WAN appliance, dedicated specifically to providing the simple configuration benefits of site-to-site Auto VPN for customers running or migrating IT services to an Amazon Web Services or Microsoft Azure Virtual Private Cloud (VPC).N/A
Norton Secure VPN
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Norton Secure VPN is designed to help secure private information like passwords, bank details and credit card numbers when using public Wi-Fi on a PC, Mac or mobile device. It is provided by NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec).N/A
Pricing
Cisco Meraki vMXNorton Secure VPN
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Meraki vMXNorton Secure VPN
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Meraki vMXNorton Secure VPN
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Cisco Meraki vMXNorton Secure VPN
Virtual Private Network
Comparison of Virtual Private Network features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Meraki vMX
7.7
5 Ratings
10% below category average
Norton Secure VPN
-
Ratings
AES 256-bit Encryption9.15 Ratings00 Ratings
Kill Switch9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Platform Support5.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Split Tunneling7.63 Ratings00 Ratings
IP Address Masking6.52 Ratings00 Ratings
No-Logs Policy6.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Server Locations7.94 Ratings00 Ratings
Simultaneous Connections9.15 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Support Services8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Meraki vMXNorton Secure VPN
Small Businesses
Avast Small Business Solutions
Avast Small Business Solutions
Score 8.4 out of 10
Avast Small Business Solutions
Avast Small Business Solutions
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Score 9.2 out of 10
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Score 9.2 out of 10
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Meraki vMXNorton Secure VPN
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(7 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.1
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Meraki vMXNorton Secure VPN
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
We are a heavily invested Meraki environment, from our corporate locations to APs. Using a vMX as apposed another solution is a no brainer. It integrates well, has the same benefits as the rest of the Meraki stack, and you can leverage your favorite cloud platform
Read full review
NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec)
When looking up the networks I can plug into there was only about 29 countries available whereas other VPN's I've used had quite a few more countries availble to use. This was bit of a bummer but not too cumbersome. Next in the area of not recording my browser history I believe that this is were the software excels.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Works well with physical Meraki MX devices
  • Site-to-Site VPNs are easy to set up with other Meraki devices
  • Cisco Meraki vMX provides a great solution for a virtual environment, like Azure
Read full review
NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec)
  • Protects personal data
  • Secures information
  • Allows testing of software in other regions
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Client VPN: Cisco Meraki vMX in general needs to implement multiple VPN profiles/ group policies for client VPN
  • Alerts: Cisco Meraki vMX in general should be more consistent in sending alerts. We should receive alarms instantly.
  • Event logs: More in-depth event logs for all Meraki products, such as system crashes, etc.
Read full review
NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec)
  • There are no clear instructions on how to use Wireguard
  • Weak P2P support
  • The network is quite small
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
I've used the FortiGate VM appliance many times and this was much better to use, it was a full feature set and had no setbacks ever. But people use Meraki for different reasons likely so it's not 100% apples to apples. As an SR engineer, I demand deep feature sets, etc, while some users strive for simplistic networks that are very visually appealing.
Read full review
NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec)
Norton is more affordable and easier to use.
Read full review
Scalability
Cisco
We have over 350 locations and growing. We chose Cisco Meraki vMX because of ease of use and how it scales.
Read full review
NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec)
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • vMX is cheaper than Azure VPN gateway
  • there is no native support for HA, so you need to deploy second instance
Read full review
NortonLifeLock (formerly Symantec)
  • I have recorded no hard numbers
  • Business impact is notably privacy which is a positive
  • Return on investment is negligable
Read full review
ScreenShots