Codacy vs Upsource

• Automation - Regularly check-up for your code commits. For example, you push code to Git, it will automatically update your code ratings
• Code Support - They support all major languages, for example, Python, PHP, JAVA. Thus, it becomes fast and easy to get real-time quality for your code.
• Analytics - Intuitive UI and easy dashboard give a clear display of your codebase.
• Reach - Codacy is very popular and the only good source of code quality solution.

Read full review

• Automatically watch git repositories
• Track all commits in a branch in a single commit
• Integrates with build server to report build status of specific commits when looking at reviews/commits
• Integrates with JetBrains IDEs
• Ability for reviewers to add comments inline and require comments to be resolved before approval
• Built in diff viewer, both stacked and side-by-side

Read full review

• Could be faster.
• Sometimes settings configuration pages are overwhelming.

Read full review

• Creating and closing reviews isn't as quick as it could be. You must create a review, assign reviewers, approve and close. I wish there would be a quick review-approve-close for a commit where the change is simple and doesn't require multiple review iterations.
• Web based interface can be clunky, especially when looking at big diffs side-by-side
• JetBrains IDE integration is somehow less convenient than going using it in browser.

Read full review

• The best part after implementing the tool is that we now stand a benchmark. Our clients are more than happy to have a good quality of code.
• Increased efficiency, decision making, code reach, privacy, and standards which means it is easily acceptable internationally.
• Even you enter private information in a piece of code, it automatically asks you to remove any vulnerable information which can harm your privacy.
• Pricing is a bit high for personal customizations.

Read full review

• Increased our code base quality
• Reduced the number of bugs found after deployment (bugs are found in review and fixed before deploy)
• Improved knowledge sharing

Read full review