Crestron Mercury vs. Mitel 6900 IP Series

It is well suited for small to medium sized conference room where video calls with your own device can be utilized. The Mercury essentially allows you to use any communication platform that you currently are using on your own devices. Works well as a stand alone speaker phone as well

Incentivized

It's very easy to use, the new version with the touch screen is absolutely outstanding. It's easy to set up and provide login instructions for everyone who uses it as well..

• The interface is simple to use and intuitive
• The speaker and mic provide ample coverage
• Everything you need for a basic conference room is included

Incentivized

• Make calls
• Receive calls
• Check vm
• Easy setup

• Camera functionality
• there is no option for PTZ cameras

Incentivized

• Can be confusing for non tech users
• Better charging
• Shorter charge

Ease of use and simple features. Intuitive user interface.

Incentivized

It's just a wonderful phone system. It's insanely helpful and easy to set up queues, groups etc

The Poly can use any video platform, but you have to pick only one. You do not have the ability to BYOD and use a different platform. Both the camera unit and the controller are connected to your network separately and sometime come un-paired and will not "speak" to each other and must be reset

Incentivized

Used to use the old ones without the touch screen or wireless headset, this make it much easier to navigate and talk on the phone

• It has allowed us to continue with hybrid working with remote customers or workers still working from home
• being able to use my own device in a conference room for video calls help bring back together the workforce that has been able to return to the office onsite with those who are not.
• Reduced travel when fully functioning options like are a great solution for meetings.

Incentivized

• It makes calling users simple
• Helps keep a fair rotation for incoming calls
• Good for team to see who's on calls.or breaks