Epom Ad Server vs. AdButler

I started using Epom for its multi-platform capabilities, as I needed a network which would allow managing desktop and mobile ad inventory simultaneously. Epom works with desktop, mobile web, video, and mobile app ads, all within one account. It is really convenient when it comes to analytics - Epom delivers combined data, providing the whole picture on your ad campaigns. Advanced targeting and real-time statistics are another great advantage

AdButler is suitable for any company size but I would said that it is better for small to medium-sized agencies. AdButler is highly scalable but the control panel/dashboard could be challenging to manage if you have many campaigns or many users. It's also a good alternative for ad networks, which would like to manage multiple relationships with publishers.

Incentivized

• Offers detailed reporting and analytics, providing insights into campaign performance.
• Epom Ad Server offers faster ad serving times
• Extended customization and targeting options

• Organize your online publishers
• Organize your campaigns
• Reports are very simple and easy to read

Incentivized

• The user interface has a lot of functionality, but is not always user-friendly.
• Hardly any predefined analytics templates available. Even some of the obvious dashboards and filters must be created manually.

• Assigning multiple video publishers to a single campaign is something that they need to improve
• The publisher dashboard is a little complicated to understand

Incentivized

A combination of useful features for publishers and advertisers turns Epom into a very universal ad network with diverse functionality. It is a great solution for multi-platform advertising.

Epom supports various ad formats, providing us with options for display ads, video ads, in-apps, native ads, and more. We also like the flexibility and customization options that Epom provides for businesses regarding specific requirements, allowing us to tailor the ad server to our needs.

AdButler is very convenient and very cost effective. Additionally, when you change a setup at the ad level, the server shows the change immediately; there's no delay. Ad Manager is better when you manage a significant amount of campaigns and users, but it's not that cheap in the end and you always have to wait for any change. EPOM is also a good solution, but the look and feel are old and it's complicated for some users to manage properly.

Incentivized

• Epom Ad Server met all the expectations of our ad network, our publishers, and our advertisers. The easy management and high scalability is a very nice bonus.

• AdButler is very affordable and your ROI would be good always
• It's also highly scalable

Incentivized