ESO Electronic Health Record (EHR) is a web-based patient care documentation and reference system for emergency medical responders and firefighters. It's designed to provide easy access to information about patients' medications, allergies, history, etc. from a tablet while in the field, and allow healthcare providers to document patient encounters quickly.
N/A
CareLogic EHR
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Qualifacts, headquartered in Nashville, is the developer of the CareLogic enterprise electronic health record system. CareLogic provides scheduling, documentation, billing and reporting designed specifically for behavioral health and human services organizations across the United States.
N/A
Pricing
ESO Electronic Health Record
CareLogic EHR
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ESO EHR
CareLogic EHR
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ESO Electronic Health Record
CareLogic EHR
Features
ESO Electronic Health Record
CareLogic EHR
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
ESO Electronic Health Record
6.3
1 Ratings
14% below category average
CareLogic EHR
5.6
6 Ratings
26% below category average
Charting / document management
10.01 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Templates
10.01 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support
10.01 Ratings
5.82 Ratings
Fax integration
5.01 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems
7.01 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Workflow automation
1.01 Ratings
6.73 Ratings
Customization
1.01 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
Patient portal
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
E-prescribing
00 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
ESO Electronic Health Record
9.5
1 Ratings
14% above category average
CareLogic EHR
4.5
6 Ratings
59% below category average
HIPAA compliance
10.01 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Role-based permission levels
8.01 Ratings
1.04 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy
10.01 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe
10.01 Ratings
1.03 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Product A and Product B
ESO Electronic Health Record
6.0
1 Ratings
23% below category average
CareLogic EHR
2.6
4 Ratings
98% below category average
Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities
6.01 Ratings
1.14 Ratings
Task tracking
00 Ratings
5.83 Ratings
Specialty-specific workflows
00 Ratings
1.03 Ratings
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Product A and Product B
ESO Electronic Health Record
-
Ratings
CareLogic EHR
4.2
3 Ratings
57% below category average
Claims management
00 Ratings
4.02 Ratings
Coding
00 Ratings
4.92 Ratings
Patient billing
00 Ratings
3.92 Ratings
Financial Reporting
00 Ratings
3.93 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
For most EMS providers, ESO EHR is an ideal solution: It meets 95% of the needs for the typical EMS provider, provides an unparalleled ease of use for field personnel documenting patient care, and is easy to implement and administer. Large EMS systems should carefully consider the limitations of the underdeveloped quality management modules for QA/QI programs. Large or progressive EMS systems with an advanced data analytics/data science capability should be aware of the significant challenges and limitations ESO EHR poses for data use outside of the standard analytics reports.
Carelogic EHR, by Qualifacts is the second scheduling software my company has used, and so long as there are no unfortunate changes it will be our last. It is user friendly, meaning that it is easy to train employees in, and is well organized. The simple interface takes out much of the guess work.
The biggest gap is that doing QA/QI is not scalable or streamlined for a large provider. Managing an effective QA/QI program takes an incredible amount of labor and extra work.
The lack of customization and custom fields heavily limits use of ESO EHR to capture new data points for internal quality improvement or research projects.
It is difficult to obtain information from CareLogic for use in customized reports if the user is not familiar with building reports in Pentaho.
Rather than having the capability to transmit electronic prescriptions on its own, CareLogic relies on an external program to do so. Prescribers must exit out of the document they are in so that they can access the external electronic prescription system. This system has an additional cost. It would be nice if it could be an all in one system.
While the company is usually eager to respond to customer needs, something always seems to be broken or need updating in regards to functionality. This may be a function of our agency's location and the unusual needs we have due to our state mandates, but it is tiring to always have to worry about a workaround.
The rating of "3" represents CareLogic's quick loading of pages, however, the reports are super slow and there is no progress bar or notification to let you know if a report is running or not. I've let a report run for an hour before only to find out that the interface never registered my click to run the report.
The customer support at Qualifacts is great. When you have an issue you can submit a ticket to support and they're on top of getting things straightened out and always available by phone as well. The struggle with the overall support is it doesn't seem like the needs of the users are heard. When you ask for what should be a simple fix or something that seems the system is missing, it gets labeled an Enhancement Request which is where requests go to pasture.
ESO EHR won out due to ease of use for providers and for administration. Other vendors had greater ability to do data analysis, quality management, and customization but ultimately were significantly more difficult to learn, use, and administer.
CareLogic is more a affordable that other competitors. CareLogic takes less time to understand and incorporate. I would say that it has its limitations and is not as intuitive. There is a lot of clicking back and forth between functions and can be annoying. There is also sometimes loss of data. If something goes wrong in the program there is no backup- this may be something that can be added, but my company has chosen not to