F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs. Kemp LoadMaster

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
F5 states that the "brain" of the BIG-IP platform, Local Traffic Manager (LTM) intelligently manages network traffic so applications are always fast, available, and secure.N/A
Kemp LoadMaster
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
LoadMaster from Kemp Technologies in New York is an application delivery controller.
$1,720
per year
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)Kemp LoadMaster
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
VLM-500
1,720
per year
VLM-500
2,000
perpetual license
VLM-3000
3,050
per year
VLM-3000
4,000
perpetual license
VLM-MAX
7,610
per year
VLM-MAX
10,000
perpetual license
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)Kemp LoadMaster
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)Kemp LoadMaster
Considered Both Products
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Chose F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) has more features, cost is higher in some scenarios, lower in others
Kemp LoadMaster

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)Kemp LoadMaster
Small Businesses
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.7 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.7 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.5 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)Kemp LoadMaster
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(32 ratings)
9.0
(64 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(1 ratings)
8.6
(4 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(11 ratings)
9.0
(26 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(28 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)Kemp LoadMaster
Likelihood to Recommend
F5
I mean the only reason we changed away from it was price and it just simply had to do with the licensing that Citrix was offering on the NetScalers. They had basically an all you can eat consumption license that we were easily inside of with all of our VDI usage, whereas with F5 we had to buy the hardware and we had to license the software. Any place you need to actually do traffic balancing at scale, it's a fantastic product. I couldn't recommend it highly enough. There's just some things that hardware SSL offload and hardware load balancing just simply can't be equal that I don't know if there's a better product on the market for that.
Read full review
Kemp Technologies
Loadmaster is very powerful and flexible load balancer. Variety of options allows to create a complex network of rules and routes. During our website rollout Loadmaster allowed us to run multiple generations of the website simultaneously and seamlessly by doing the content switching on the fly. Powerful API allows easy integration into any development lifecycle.
Read full review
Pros
F5
  • Sure. It does load balancing fantastically. I mean, it's an industry standard product for that. We also use it for TLS offload for applications. Those are the two main use cases for that. We do also use some of the I rules for traffic filtering. We've used that in some of the external facing services. It does a really nice job with that. It's a little bit complicated sometimes and some of the Cipher Suite stuff is interesting.
Read full review
Kemp Technologies
  • Where the LoadBalancer excels is the multiple levels at which you can load balance servers. We currently use layer 7 LB, but others are available as well.
  • I particularly like the ability for the LB to know when servers are down, and if all are offline then you can create a redirect to a static HTML page or some other destination that is more informative.
  • The ease in which a service can be created and deployed using already pre-canned templates makes it a very convenient setup process.
Read full review
Cons
F5
  • Some of the stuff you have to dive into the CLI to really use, I'm going to reach back to the previous employer for this. So I had a much greater degree of involvement with it at that point in time for, I was the crypto guy at the company and I had to design all the cipher suites that we actually implemented on our front end banking products. So in order to do that, I had to dive into it, download all the Cipher suites, figure out the actual order of operation for them, how they were selected because I wanted to design the Cipher Suites to actually provide a specific customer experience for the types of connections that our customers were likely to initiate. Getting at that information was a giant PITA. It was poorly documented at the time. I'm not sure if it's documented any better now. Every time the software changed or got upgraded, made your version, I'd have to do it all over again because the upgrades to the stack, which looked like it was based on open SSL, but it was heavily modified with a different syntax. Oh yay. That's fun too. So I had to write giant documents describing all of the ciphers that I was designing for this because it just kept changing all the time. So I didn't care for that aspect of it. Traffic management does a great job for that.
Read full review
Kemp Technologies
  • Ability to 'clone' existing Virtual Services for rapid deployment of similar ones.
  • A better API for ease of automation.
  • Simplification of Certificate management.
  • Better explanations of Kemp implementations of industry standard protocols like VRRP (or CARP)
  • More control over device factory reset configuration and forcibly breaking HA pairs at boot time
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
F5
F5 has always been one of the best products we have in the data center. We had few issues with the BUG and Code upgrades but the main use cases for F5 was always top notch. From High availability to Globally load balancing applications across multiple data centers and muti cloud environments.
Read full review
Kemp Technologies
I'm very pleased with the support I've received as well as the quality of the product.
Read full review
Usability
F5
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is very easy to use. Building each application is straightforward forward and the help function and now with the new AI assistant soon to be available, it is going to be easier than ever to be able to understand and implement each application.
Read full review
Kemp Technologies
Kemp makes it very easy to setup, configure and manage the LoadMaster without needing a lot of help from their engineers. The interface is very easy to understand and intuitive to use. We like how it is not complicated - I can easily have one of my techs login and they can figure out how to setup/configure virtual services for load balancing without needing a manual or tech support.
Read full review
Support Rating
F5
No answers on this topic
Kemp Technologies
Support has been easy to deal with; I have only need[ed] to contact them a few times during setup. Once its been in place and operational, we have not need[ed] to mess with the system [which] is a huge advantage. I like system[s] that do not break and require constant attention in a production environment.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
F5
No answers on this topic
Kemp Technologies
The installation was straight forward. Once i installed it, their technical support team helped me with configuration
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
F5
F5 is doing its specialized function. There is no other product that can beat them. We are extremely happy with the product. Especially on load balancing, traffic redirecting TLS encryption, and SNI modification. We will continue to explore F5's product, especially on the public cloud side. e.g. NGINX.
Read full review
Kemp Technologies
We chose Kemp LoadMaster because it is 1/10 the price of the competition and MUCH easier to deploy and configure and WORKS. We have had ZERO issues with the product since installation. Their engineers and their sales team have both reached out post-install to check in and see if everything is working as expected.
Read full review
Return on Investment
F5
  • The F5 LTMs have had a very positive impact on our business objectives. Are websites are very heavily utilized with users all over the globe.
  • The F5 LTMs have provided a mechanism for making difficult applications work with our current infrastructure like MS teams.
  • The F5 LTMs are very good at customizing irules to deal with everyday issues.
Read full review
Kemp Technologies
  • We used Kemp LoadMaster for many projects. For a lot of customers, load balancers were too expensive or too complicated before we introduced Kemp products.
  • It's not a overly complicated product, so we were able to train many engineers on it and have them get a certification.
Read full review
ScreenShots