Function Point is a project management software built specifically for ad agencies, design studios, and marketing departments.
$46
per month per user
Resource Guru
Score8 out of 10
N/A
Resource Guru is presented as a fast, flexible way to schedule teams and projects. It enables users to: Manage people, equipment, and meeting rooms in one place Assign work, book time off, and edit schedules in seconds Track availability in real-time and avoid unrealistic workloads Keep a team up-to-date with personal dashboards and daily schedule emails Analyze utilization rates, clients, and projects for more accurate project forecasts and…
$6
per month per user
Pricing
Function Point Productivity Software
Resource Guru
Editions & Modules
Agency (30-49)
$46
per month per user
Studio (10-29)
$48
per month per user
Boutique (5-9)
$52
per month per user
Enterprise
Call for Pricing
per month per user
Grasshopper Plan
$6
per month
Blackbelt Plan
$9.60
per month
Master Plan
$14.40
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Function Point Productivity Software
Resource Guru
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Customers save 11% on annual billing. Demo’s available.
Discount available for annual billing.
More Pricing Information
Features
Function Point Productivity Software
Resource Guru
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Function Point Productivity Software and Resource Guru
Feature
Function Point Productivity Software
7.9
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Resource Guru
8.8
3 Ratings
14% above category average
Task Management
8.86 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
8.85 Ratings
8.93 Ratings
Gantt Charts
8.86 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
8.86 Ratings
8.63 Ratings
Workflow Automation
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
7.96 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
7.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document Management
5.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email integration
7.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
6.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
8.86 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
8.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
8.56 Ratings
00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Function Point Productivity Software and Resource Guru
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is very well suited when different branches of the company reside in different countries or time zones. It allows the project manager to efficiently keep track of the progress of their team members. It reduces the need for intensive calls where the manager asks for an extensive check in and update from each individual person. It also allows the project manager to update tasks and timelines as needed.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Time tracking - like several time tracking solutions, FP uses a clock that will track in real time so that you do not need to remember how long you worked on a project to input later.
Dashboards - I love FP's dashboards that let me track my personal utilization, the utilization of my team members and all of my open tasks.
Reporting - FP's reports provide insight organization-wide into how we are doing and where we (as an organization) are spending our time. As with any reporting, though, it is important to manage the cleanliness of your data to make the reporting useful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Function Point often provided reports that were inaccurate due to bad calculations. The support team would work with us to troubleshoot these issues, but the fact remained that calculations were wrong.
Function Point was purchased by a new parent company that increased prices over their nearest, superior, competitor, pricing themselves out of the market.
Function Point's interface is dated, as is its code base.
New features are being implemented not as software revisions or upgrades, but as new for-pay features.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Workamajig was NOT a good fit, after over a year of back-end setup. FunctionFox didn't have the financial integration capabilities we needed, but we used it for years and were happy with the service and support. FunctionPoint brought together the 30,000-foot view of the projects and resources with a simplified process for getting day-to-day jobs into the queue, which was essential for our organization.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Resource Guru is the only product of it's kind that I have used regularly. Slack is comparable in allowing communication between teams, but doesn't have nearly the functionality of Resource Guru. Resource Guru is the only product that I am aware of that manages tasks and deadlines between various team members, and can be accessed by all members.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info