IBM Security MaaS360 vs. Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Security MaaS360
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
IBM Security MaaS360 is a mobile security offering developed by Fiberlink, acquired and owned by IBM since early 2014.
$4
Per Client
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
GlobalProtect™ delivers the protection of next-generation security platform to the mobile workforce in order to stop targeted cyberattacks, evasive application traffic, phishing, malicious websites, command-and-control traffic, and known and unknown threats.N/A
Pricing
IBM Security MaaS360Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$4
Per Client
Deluxe
$5
Per Client
Premier
$6.25
Per Client
Enterprise
$9
Per Client
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Security MaaS360Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Security MaaS360Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
IBM Security MaaS360Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Small Businesses
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Citrix Endpoint Management
Citrix Endpoint Management
Score 8.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Security MaaS360Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(45 ratings)
8.1
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.3
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.1
(33 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.3
(34 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Security MaaS360Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
This product has helped me find lost mobile devices and has helped protect our corporate intellectual property as well as making it easier to support our 700 users in our Canada manufacturing facilities. We are better able to manage our fleet of devices and manage the apps that are being used on these devices as well as which apps are being used. We can easily wipe out a device if someone resigns and to better protect information. It makes it easier to deploy a completely configured mobile device to remote users and supports Apple, Android or BYOD. Once configured correctly this product integrates seamlessly with Apple to better manage off the shelf apps or custom applications. This product has made my life working with managing two different corporate entities and their divisions all across Canada with relative ease and leaves me more time to work on other issues. And reports are simple and customizable making it simple to see and understand and utilize the information to make better informed decisions.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
Depending on the complexity of your equipment, devices, the network you are with, the size of your company, or the budget you are willing to pay, you should consider buying Prisma. I have in mind that it is a tool to make the leap to extra security for your devices; it is a complex tool that cannot be learned in a single day. Without a doubt, I would recommend her to a company that has a proven track record and knows what it wants.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • BYOD encourages use of personal devices like smartphones, tablets, laptops and wearables to access enterprise data from anywhere.
  • UEM provides best outstanding user experience and data security.
  • Makes mobile device management easy and more centralized.
  • Provides more Security Revolution to all our devices to protect all the sophisticated cybercrimes.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Complete control and configuration of iOS devices across our network.
  • Great username options in the latest version to help keep our devices organized and easy to manage.
  • Easy to enroll devices to connect to the VPN.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • MaaS360 with Watson has a lot of features and capabilities, which can sometimes make it difficult for us to navigate. Improving the user interface and making it friendly could help make the platform easier to use.
  • Expanding integrations with other systems to provide better support for a wider range of systems and platforms.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • It lags a bit on new features
  • It is best used with an entire Palo Alto environment
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
Rock solid solution with highly accessible support when needed. We do not want to interact with MaaS360 on a daily basis but when an issue occurs we are always able to find resolution due to the various support resources we have access to
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
Having years of experience with MDM and experiencing the evolution of the granularity of the functionality MDM's have had to evolve, no MDM is ever "easy" to use. MaaS360 rises to the top however, because zero day changes are always ahead of the competition. A huge benefit with MaaS360 and IBM's approach to supporting these changes is that they seldom change configuration work flows. Competing Vendors always arbitrarily change workflows which requires a significnat ongoing learning curve in order to maintain technical competence
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
IBM
Never had an outage in 11 years of using this solution
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Performance
IBM
typically very consistent but occasionaly some lag
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
MaaS360's phone support has been decent the few times I have used it. In addition the person who on-boarded us has been available for additional questions after the process was over. However IBM could do a much better job in creating a user-friendly search engine and white-paper database to help people find topics. Right now finding info is more based on searching through white papers themselves.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Online Training
IBM
The resources made available to me by IBM were Stellar. These resources remain available today and are extremely important as technology changes
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
IBM
To implement IBM Security MaaS360 with Watson, follow these steps: Set up the platform, enroll devices, configure policies and settings, monitor and manage devices. Implementing it can help organizations to securely manage and monitor the use of mobile devices and related resources in their networks, improving security and productivity for their users.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
I really love how this software is full-featured comes with all kind of robust features allows us to lock down all aspects of our devices incase the device is lost of stolen. It also allows us to install apps remotely ability to track location set-up mobile data groups is awesome and allows diagnostic messaging when data limit is reached.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
The management of connections is much more seamless with the Palo tool. AnyConnect was always a nightmare to get in and manage individual connections to what can and cannot be accessed based on IP addresses. We ended going with the newer methodology of remote access so that our users would be authenticated prior to entering login credentials.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
Rock solid, consistent solution
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • We were able to reduce our monthly bill for iPad data usage by well over 60%. Simply by limiting the applications available to what was absolutely necessary to do their jobs.
  • We have never had an iPad lost that couldn’t be recovered.
  • We were able to reassign iPads when we discovered techs were not using them. Some techs preferred to use their company phones.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • It allowed us to pass very strict audits from the world's largest banks.
  • It was easy for our IT department to implement.
Read full review
ScreenShots