Joomla! is a free and open source content management system used to publish web content. Included features are page caching, RSS feeds, printable versions of pages, news flashes, blogs, polls, a search function, and support for language internationalization.
N/A
Progress Sitefinity
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Progress Sitefinity is a content management and customer analytics platform. It supports content management, tailored marketing, multi-channel management, and ecommerce sites.
N/A
Pricing
Joomla!
Progress Sitefinity
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Joomla
Progress Sitefinity
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Joomla!
Progress Sitefinity
Considered Both Products
Joomla
Verified User
Professional
Chose Joomla!
Joomla is more of a developer's CMS. It is much more customizable than WordPress.
Joomla! did not have the stability we needed. WordPress did not offer a .net friendly environment so it made more sense to go with Sitefinity. With Sitefinity we have the endless possibilities when it comes to developing our own web controls and working with the CMS API. Since …
It's been six years since I evaluated all of the possible CMS platforms. I really liked Sitecore but it was substantially more expensive. I really like Joomla but felt it would be most successful if you have a web designer/developer on staff. I also looked at a lot of other …
This was already implemented when I arrived here but have looked into moving it to another platform. The time involved in doing that is just not worth the time right now. Sitefinity does what it is supposed to but it's not the most user friendly and support is not very good.
Sr. Associate - Project Management and Information Technology
Chose Progress Sitefinity
All continent management systems are built to do basically, the same thing...manage content. When Trellist makes a CMS recommendation to a client, it is primarily based on the project requirements, how easy it is to customize the CMS, how intuitive it is for the content …
We thought it would be better, and especially better suited for .NET and Azure solutions.
In the end, I would say Sitefinity is worse in nearly all aspects, including Microsoft technology integration.