Netskope CASB vs. Zscaler SASE

Well suited for an organization that is either architecting their environment for majority SaaS usage, or presently is a cloud-first organization and wants greater insight into their existing cloud placements. It does provide good first-level DLP and will need to be supplemented with a purpose drive DLP control.

Incentivized

Zscaler is suited for organization where a lot of employees work remotely and need access a lot of cloud application. The ability for a downloaded file to be in a sandbox before delivering to the use is an awesome feature. It ensure that your user can connect to any network and they will be secure.

Incentivized

• Monitoring all traffic
• Protecting your end user traffic

Incentivized

• It secure cloud-based application without the data center having complex configuration.
• Reports are easily customizable from minute details that you want as IT to High level overview for executive presentation.
• Category blocking with different profiles-these categories updated in real time for better protection.

Incentivized

• Infrastructure resilience.
• Growth and scale issues.

Incentivized

• Failover monitoring for GRE tunnel could be improved although it does work
• support need to be improved.
• Sometimes blocking genuine access also.

Incentivized

There have been some struggles with their infrastructure keeping pace with demand and load. Support can only do so much and has to defer to known problems being escalated.

Incentivized

We felt that Netskope provided a more holistic view in the CASB space from a user and usage perspective. In addition, the cost structure for Menlo was a bit higher and was a bit more complicated in the installation and maintenance perspectives

Incentivized

• We end up troubleshooting many not existing issues thanks to Netskope.

Incentivized

• We are slowly moving away from VPN as our primary security mechanism and this permits this.
• Bandwidth control.
• The user can disable this anytime

Incentivized