Nintex offers a platform that helps companies discover, automate, and optimize business processes.
$480
Minimum 1,000 users per user
Notion
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Notion aims to present users with an all-in-one workspace — for notes, tasks, wikis, and databases, from Notion Labs in San Francisco.
$5
per month per user
Wrike
Score 8.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$240
per year 2 users (minimum)
Pricing
Nintex
Notion
Wrike
Editions & Modules
Enterprise - Process Platform
$480
Minimum 1,000 users per user
Free
$0
Plus
$12
per month per user
Business
$24
per month per user
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Apex
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Nintex
Notion
Wrike
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
A discount is offered for annual billing.
Every premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
I was not part of selecting Nintex, but I think Nintex does a better job of generating linear flowcharts vs. Microsoft Visio because it automates the majority of the process of creating process maps. (Microsoft Visio is better for creating flowcharts that are not linear. …
The firm can handle its complicated operations in the most efficient way possible thanks to a number of capabilities included in the Nintex workflow platform.
Nintex Process Platform is a very affordable and economical tool as it reduces time wastage and operational cost, unlike its alternatives. This tool offers outstanding and responsive technical support services to its customers.
I don't think that Notion stacks to some of them, i mean i think it's better than Evernote with all it's features, but you really can't compare it that well with ClickUp and Confluence, i mean those are after all deeply rooted to the project management aspect of ClickUp and …
It's a combination of the three put together but with the added benefit of web hosting being a part of its core. The other tools are more the same thing, with just a couple of different elements in between. Notion combines them all and consistently adds new functions to its core.
I didn't select Wrike, my company did. I'm not sure if Notion allows cross functional communication, I used it for personal project tracking like job hunting. I think Wrike is more task management based instead of simply record things, so it's better for organizations.
Considering my team's needs, Wrike is a comprehensive project management solution offering features like task management, time tracking, and collaboration tools alongside advanced capabilities such as Gantt charts and resource management. From my point of view, Notion and Trello…
Wrike sits just below Notion for me in terms or ranking because Notion is much more customisable from a user side of things. Wrike at an organisation level, however, is clear, templated and consistent.
Previously I have used Asana and Trello in other roles and these fell just …
At the time when we we selected Wrike, we spent a lot of time comparing different task management tools. Wrike and Asana were the top two. At the time, Wrike's feature set, and price point better matched our needs. I have not kept up or reviewed Asana since that time, so I'm …
We currently use both Salesforce and Wrike. Not our entire company has access to Wrike or have a reason to use it at this point. Some of our employees uses Salesforce for account management of single locations. We also have our ticketing system in Salesforce with our Support …
Trello is a simpler, more visual project management tool. More situated for smaller, less technically savvy teams. Vs. Asana, Wrike it similar but has more customization options. Vs. Teamwork.com, they are comparable although it's easier to see the big picture using Wrike - the …
Features
Nintex
Notion
Wrike
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Nintex
6.8
189 Ratings
14% below category average
Notion
-
Ratings
Wrike
-
Ratings
Dashboards
6.8174 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.0177 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
6.6142 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Nintex
7.1
257 Ratings
16% below category average
Notion
-
Ratings
Wrike
-
Ratings
Process designer
7.7228 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process simulation
5.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Business rules engine
7.6197 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
SOA support
7.0173 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process player
7.455 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for modeling languages
6.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form builder
8.0227 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Model execution
7.8180 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Nintex
9.0
18 Ratings
7% above category average
Notion
-
Ratings
Wrike
-
Ratings
Social collaboration tools
9.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
Nintex
10.0
23 Ratings
21% above category average
Notion
-
Ratings
Wrike
-
Ratings
Content management
10.023 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Nintex
-
Ratings
Notion
7.3
79 Ratings
6% below category average
Wrike
8.0
914 Ratings
3% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
8.174 Ratings
9.1905 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
6.846 Ratings
7.9635 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
6.957 Ratings
8.4791 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
6.455 Ratings
7.9782 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
7.372 Ratings
7.9658 Ratings
Search
00 Ratings
8.075 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual planning tools
00 Ratings
7.968 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.8777 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.6905 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.7503 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.9452 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.6761 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.8682 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.7427 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.723 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.6325 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Nintex
-
Ratings
Notion
7.8
76 Ratings
3% below category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Chat
00 Ratings
6.229 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications
00 Ratings
7.568 Ratings
00 Ratings
Discussions
00 Ratings
7.349 Ratings
00 Ratings
Surveys
00 Ratings
6.720 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
00 Ratings
8.869 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
00 Ratings
8.98 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Nintex
-
Ratings
Notion
8.1
76 Ratings
1% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Versioning
00 Ratings
7.657 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video files
00 Ratings
7.649 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audio files
00 Ratings
7.343 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document collaboration
00 Ratings
8.571 Ratings
00 Ratings
Access control
00 Ratings
8.271 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced security features
00 Ratings
7.251 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive
00 Ratings
9.213 Ratings
00 Ratings
Device sync
00 Ratings
9.253 Ratings
00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
We use Nintex to automate fundraising outreach at scale. It helps us send personalized emails to a large contact list, and we’d also like to automate follow-ups when there’s no reply. If you need highly customized solutions or clean, fully controllable code, I wouldn’t recommend Nintex. It has many features, but it’s not the same as building your own system from scratch. That said, it can save a lot of time for standard automation workflows.
If you want a customizable solution that can be adapted for just about any scenario, I recommend using Notion. If you need a solution that's easy to share with people outside your organization, Notion is great and allows individual or team permission-setting. If you want a turnkey solution, Notion might not be the best since it requires a fair bit of set-up. There are templates that can be purchased to handle this, but I haven't found them very helpful.
I believe it's well suited if you have multiple jobs/projects that you need to keep organized. We work with multiple job types from print/creative to web, copy and digital ads so it helps us stay organized. I don't think it would be suitable for a company that doesn't have a lot of jobs to manage. We average over 1,200 requests a year.
Integrations with other services using various secure authentication methods, along with the seamless integration with SharePoint, are the icing on the cake. This makes it superior to other BPM tools available in the market.
Flexibility in application development - The diverse configurable properties offer multiple ways to utilise the controls and events, affording the flexibility to expand your scope and enabling the creation and use of processes in a myriad of ways.
The streamlined and efficient deployment process significantly accelerates release management, allowing for faster and smoother implementation of updates and new features.
The user interface of the pages offers a more refined and appealing look and feel compared to most other BPM tools.
If you are creating a process with parallel subprocesses, there's no way to see, in a single view in Nintex, all the steps for the subprocesses. You have to view each sub-process in its own view, so it's hard to see what's going on at a high level.
There isn't an easy way to filter the processes by another user (not yourself) in Nintex. There is a report that shows processes and objects by user, but that's not as convenient. This is something that I've seen in other tools (OpenPages by IBM) so I am surprised that it is missing.
Nintex doesn't really have a way to capture iterative processes (which we have a lot of). It's designed for linear processes.
I use Notion on my personal tablet, and unlike on the computer, I have a lot of difficulty editing backgrounds, GIFs, and page dividers. It's not as user-friendly, and often the elements end up cut off or misaligned, which is frustrating.
While the current calendar feature is helpful, I'd love to see more customization options. The Google Calendar style isn't always ideal, especially for tasks without specific times or for ongoing projects that require daily maintenance.
It would be fantastic to have more flexibility in customizing Notion pages. For example, I'd love to create planners with the freedom to add illustration boxes, stickers, or GIFs without being restricted to a fixed layout.
We are currently investigating which collaboration platform best suits our needs. Chances are that we move to SharePoint Online and then we're going to also consider the microsoft power platform (power automate and power apps) to develop forms and workflows. Aspecially the pricing model for the cloud is currently a blocking factor to go for the Nintex solution in the Cloud.
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Based on the on-prem experience with this tool, I believe that they have a lot of potential to help the online version catch up to where the on-prem left off. Nintex developed their online version and it is not as fully formed or capable compared to the on-prem version, and the licensing model scales back what we would have liked to be an expansion or at least continuous improvement of existing flows. It is also not near as user friendly specifically to non-developers and has an uncanny similarity to Microsoft Flow in the online instance. Consistent with my reviews of the tool - I believe they have some good approaches to design thinking that, if translated well from on-prem to online, could make this a clear winner again.
Very easy to use (I learned how to use everything on my own) and I was able to set up an entire ecosystem without any courses or other tools. I often say that Notion is like Lego for adults, because there we can use all the available tools to create a multitude of things, from funnels to projects with calculated deadlines and tags.
It does take some time and work to really understand and use it properly, but I think the accessibility to help and documentation make that completely feasible. Once you know how to use it, I find it to be very user-friendly, and have very few complaints.
The Nintex Process Platform has never crashed or had any availability issues during my usage. However there was an issue that was of my own making that caused a slowdown of the system. I had set up a process to run once a day and check for employees on a list that had certain parameters selected, and for some reason that I had to troubleshoot, the process instead ran constantly, which filled the cache quickly. I ended up having to dismantle that process so the system didn't crash.
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Unlike any other process automation product out there. Not only is it a low-code, easy to use tool for building processes in environments like SharePoint or Salesforce, they have really started to expand their tool-set by offering tools to manage other things like process mapping, RPA, mobile,etc.
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
The support team works as fast as they can and they are usually fast to solver the issues. Sometimes they need more time to solve one of them because our workflows and so on are more complex than usual clients.
During my learning phase with Wrike, I initially struggled with setting up automation rules and request forms. However, Wrike support was always my go-to, resolving issues within seconds or minutes. Their assistance made the learning process much easier. My best experience was receiving step-by-step screenshots to follow, with the support team on standby until I was completely satisfied.
I used the Nintex training software, it was easy to watch and follow along. It didn't go too fast and was descriptive enough to understand what the steps needed were in order to produce efficient workflows and user friendly forms.
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
1.Start with Simple Workflows: Begin with basic workflows to gain user confidence before tackling complex processes. 2.Involve Stakeholders Early: Engage business users and IT early to align workflows with real business needs. 3.Comprehensive Training: Invest in user training to ensure smooth adoption and reduce resistance. 4.Leverage Prebuilt Templates: Use Nintex’s templates to speed up implementation and maintain consistency. 5.Iterate and Optimize: Continuously improve workflows based on user feedback and performance metrics.
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Microsoft environment does not have the scalability of Nintex; it is perfect for small and medium-sized companies, especially in environments where Microsoft environment is almost entirely used. Although Microsoft offers options to connect to other applications, its platform lacks the development and robustness that Nintex provides. Nintex not only covers Microsoft environments but also Google and other important platforms.
The company uses both Notion and Trello within the company. Notion is more for North America employees while Trello is used between Operation team overseas and in North America. Sometimes it's a preference of how the tools look like for project management. I would say both Notion and Trello are nice tools and serves our needs.
Jira did not at all help us get our work done as content creators. I think that was because Jira wasn't quite right for our uses. Wrike fits our needs so much better. I can't tell you enough the relief I felt when we adopted Wrike and I never had to use Jira again.
The scalability is really bottlenecked by the imagination of the user. I was able to make processes for my own personal usage, making my daily tasks easier. I was also able to make processes that affected hundreds of employees, making large standardization and efficiency gains. So either way, the system is used the same way, and I was the limiting factor.
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
People have woken up to the amount of overlap after mapping their processes.
People can be resistant to process changes. You need to have the support from above or support from the 'business' that you are process changing to be able to see the positive impacts.
Numbers talk. if you can get a general salary figure from your HR dept to show savings for 'employee bands', then when you present reports, they will be all the richer in data.
Different teams (e.g., contracting, compliance, provider relations) can view updates in real time, comment directly on tasks, and escalate items when needed.
Wrike allows us to template the contracting process (from intake to signature) to ensure consistency across payers and reduce administrative overhead.
Leadership can see the status of negotiations at a glance, identify bottlenecks, and prioritize resources accordingly.