OpenText Asset Management X vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Asset Management X
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Micro Focus Asset Management X (formerly HP Asset Manager) is enterprise-class IT asset management (ITAM) solution acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett Packard Enterprise, supporting change and configuration management and license management.
$79
per month per agent
Ansible
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it.
$5,000
per year
Pricing
OpenText Asset Management XRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic Tower
5,000
per year
Enterprise Tower
10,000
per year
Premium Tower
14,000
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Asset Management XAnsible
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Asset Management XRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Features
OpenText Asset Management XRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
IT Asset Management
Comparison of IT Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Asset Management X
7.0
2 Ratings
10% below category average
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
-
Ratings
Software and hardware inventory tracking8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
License management4.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Asset lifecycle monitoring9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract management7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Asset relationship management7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management
Comparison of Configuration Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Asset Management X
-
Ratings
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
8.2
148 Ratings
2% above category average
Infrastructure Automation00 Ratings8.9142 Ratings
Automated Provisioning00 Ratings8.2139 Ratings
Parallel Execution00 Ratings8.5132 Ratings
Node Management00 Ratings8.5124 Ratings
Reporting & Logging00 Ratings7.4136 Ratings
Version Control00 Ratings7.5120 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText Asset Management XRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Small Businesses
Atera
Atera
Score 8.8 out of 10
HashiCorp Vagrant
HashiCorp Vagrant
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.4 out of 10
Automox
Automox
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.4 out of 10
Automox
Automox
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Asset Management XRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(2 ratings)
9.3
(171 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.0
(1 ratings)
9.8
(5 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(1 ratings)
8.2
(57 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(5 ratings)
Implementation Rating
5.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Asset Management XRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Asset Manager is great for people who understand the Software Development Lifecycle and are familiar with the terminology, however for a new assistant, or a new novice user, the software can seem over-whelming with the rather confusing terminology and a multitude of tabs that open up. It's definitely great software to use for a professional PM, however an assistant would be lost in the tools being offered.
Read full review
Red Hat
Red Hat Ansible automates server management, configuration updates, and deployments across our server infrastructure, keeping everything consistent, reducing human error, and saving time. Also provides detailed reports on what is done and uses role-based access controls to keep systems secure by controlling who can make changes.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Export Excel function
  • Notifications
  • Display set up
  • Contract to asset relationship
Read full review
Red Hat
  • It reduces custom scripting efforts because everything can be scripted in simple, human-readable YAML playbooks.
  • Not only servers, but also network devices, VMs, Containers, Kubernetes clusters, etc., can be automated via Ansible, showcasing its extensive list of supported devices.
  • It is agentless, which makes it lightweight and allows for easy integration into CI/CD and GitOps pipelines.
  • Many Tier-1 telcos use Ansible for Day 0/1/2 automation of RAN, transport, and core infrastructure (e.g., network function lifecycle management, NE configuration push, patching VNFs).
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • Need more video tutorials - Although HP has great FAQs and has included the keyword search for topics, but some video tutorials would be great to help a new user.
  • Overwhelming at times. I remember when I first started using the software, just the magnitude of tools were too much. However even though I don't use half the tools even now, just the possibility of more functions available to me, makes it a great software.
  • Secure Log-in - I would like HP to invest into single sign-on where you don't need to put in your user ID & password constantly. A push notification to a personal device would a great added feature.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • I can't think of any right now because I've heard about the Lightspeed and I'm really excited about that. Ansible has been really solid for us. We haven't had any issues. Maybe the upgrade process, but other than that, as coming from a user, it's awesome.
  • Give out Lightspeed for free.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
I find HP Asset Manager useful but sometimes too much data needs to be entered.
Read full review
Red Hat
Even is if it's a great tool, we are looking to renew our licence for our production servers only. The product is very expensive to use, so we might look for a cheaper solution for our non-production servers. One of the solution we are looking, is AWX, free, and similar to AAP. This is be perfect for our non-production servers.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
I have used 2 systems (chevron and HPAM), each has it's pluses and minuses. Once I was comfortable with the system I gave it an above average score
Read full review
Red Hat
It's overall pretty easy to use foe all the applications I've mentioned before: configuring hosts, installing packages through tools like apt, applying yaml, making changes across wide groups of hosts, etc. Its not a 10 because of the inconveinience of the yaml setup, and the time to write is not worth it for something applied one time to only a few hosts
Read full review
Performance
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
Great in almost every way compared to any other configuration management software. The only thing I wish for is python3 support. Other than that, YAML is much improved compared to the Ruby of Chef. The agentless nature is incredibly convenient for managing systems quickly, and if a member of your term has no terminal experience whatsoever they can still use the UI.
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
Have not interacted with HP support that much
Read full review
Red Hat
There is a lot of good documentation that Ansible and Red Hat provide which should help get someone started with making Ansible useful. But once you get to more complicated scenarios, you will benefit from learning from others. I have not used Red Hat support for work with Ansible, but many of the online resources are helpful.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
I spoke on this topic today!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
HP Asset Manager is definitely enterprise grade, whereas the other asset Management programs I have are specific to either one industry or a smaller locations that might not need the deep analysis & reporting functionalities & tools that are provided by HP. The cost is indeed higher than other programs like Fox Graphic Tracker (Internal Software) and Samange that I have used in the past, but for a large enterprise with multiple ongoing projects, HP Asset Manager is the way to go !
Read full review
Red Hat
AAP compares favorably with Terraform and Power Automate. I don't have much experience with Terraform, but I find AAP and Ansible easier to use as well as having more capabilities. Power Platform is also an excellent automation tool that is user friendly but I feel that Ansible has more compatibility with a variety of technologies.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • HP Asset Manager is great for compliance purposes. We know we have all the licenses in place when needed for upgrades or yearly reviews. Saves us times.
  • Ability to track & print reports saves PMs time in quartely reviews.
  • Great way to prepare for any presentations by the use of analytical tools which saves us money in investing in other software for presentation purposes.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • POSITIVE: currently used by the IT department and some others, but we want others to use it.
  • NEGATIVE: We need less technical output for the non-technical. It should be controllable or a setting within playbooks. We also need more graphical responses (non-technical).
  • POSITIVE: Always being updated and expanded (CaC, EDA, Policy as Code, execution environments, AI, etc..)
Read full review
ScreenShots