Qstream vs. SalesScreen

Qstream is great when used for reinforcement of training conducted. Especially when that training is detailed or complex, Qstream will help to embed key concepts and drive adoption while ensuring reps are interacting.

Incentivized

I recommend that if your group still can't find a way to work together, they don't achieve sales goals or the work becomes tedious, without a doubt SalesScreen has excellent tools that can promote and strengthen relationships between co-workers and clients.

Incentivized

• Gamification: gets reps involved in ways that keep it interesting while bringing in elements of competition.
• Mobile: ease of use and direct access to reps while on the move. The interface is intuitive and able to be interacted with in quick increments rather than lengthy elearning.
• Coaching: provides direct insights into who is coping and who is not so that enablement efforts can be focused.

Incentivized

• Integration with Salesforce, for games and group dynamics, competitions, and rewards.
• Data storage of sales representatives, management of their work, the performance they have in it, and the economic impact of their sales.
• We don't need more complicated tools, and less if it is to manage group dynamics, finding SalesScreen that is much easier to use really comforts us.

Incentivized

• Reporting: we only had access to some of the reports so would have liked to see more detail and have the ability to create custom reports.
• Licensing: we accessed qstream via Growthplay so only had access to limited features. Would like to see this extended so that we could truly experience all of the qstream benefits.
• Content Creation: we were not able to create our own questions and streams but had to rely on the external team. Self-creation and self-directed streams would have been preferable.

Incentivized

• I would like better graphics, to visualize the competitions and rewards in a much more customizable and fun way.
• Improve mobile application, we access it much more since it is more practical; however, we cannot visualize it as interactive as on the computer and this is significant.

Incentivized

Qstream is good in terms of gamification and driving adoption. However we are looking for a platform that supports content creation, ILT training as well as gamification. Qstream would meet only one of those criteria. We may still use them again if we are unable to find a compete platform in future

Incentivized

Qstream was easy for us to use and gain insights from. Feedback from sales leaders and reps was generally positive. Having greater flexibility about creating custom reports and streams would have increased the rating

Incentivized

Qstream was selected by default because it was offered by Growthplay as their preferred gamification and adoption tool. We have subsequently looked at acquiring Qstream for other initiatives and are in the process of evaluating options

Incentivized

We considered Hoopla, for having similar tools, but SalesScreen was the one that best suited our work group, and its interface was much easier to use. I like how SalesScreen presents group dynamics options like competitions or ranking, Hoopla didn't seem as interactive to me.

Incentivized

• Reps have adopted our new sales methodology quicker and with more rigour meaning we are more successful in the field.
• We’ve been able to create scale to drive adoption. Without technologies like Qstream, we would never be able to meet our enablement and growth targets.
• More reps talking a consistent message means our customer experience has improved at the sales front. This allows us to differentiate versus the competition and ensures we win more often.

Incentivized

• When our team interacted better with all the sales staff, we strengthened ties, motivated better work, and set fully achievable goals. We discovered that each sales agent gave their best and brought the company better results, with solid clients and more significant sales.

Incentivized