Sage Fixed Assets vs. ServiceNow Enterprise Asset Management

I believe that Sage is not suited well for our company because we are too large. To add new users we have to go into all 200+ companies and add their access individually. This is time-consuming and not a good way to manage access.

Incentivized

Companies with a lot of devices to keep track of. Maintaining an inventory in something on prem and not sturctured could lead to a mess of data. It is better to have it in the cloud with drop down choices to pick up. That way people can't write anything they want and you wind up with no consistency.

Incentivized

• Central Repository.
• Staying up to date on tax law changes.

Incentivized

• Adding new users with multiple company access
• Copying users

Incentivized

Rather lackluster. Our account manager generally works with Sage's support team and oftentimes finds herself frustrated with a lack of understanding from the support team. Additionally, when IT is attempting to update the system (which from my understanding is a bear of epic complex proportions) they often times find themselves frustrated and at a loss for what needs done.

Incentivized

[I believe that] Sage is nowhere near as good as Oracle. Oracle is easy to use and administer and the features are much better. The system is cloud-based so there are fewer issues with on-prem or virtual servers.

Incentivized

It does a pretty good job when compared to CounterACT by Forescout. To be honest the inventory our CounterACT servers collect on every device on the network is vast compared to what is in SNOW. CounterACT has a module for SNOW and can share its CMDB. We hope to utilize in the future.

Incentivized

• It is incredibly difficult to use and our business users generally do not look favorably on it.
• It is relatively low cost, which is a nice feature and lends to quick ROI.

Incentivized