Good for simple synthetic checks. Needs some updates.
Updated December 25, 2021
Good for simple synthetic checks. Needs some updates.
Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Apica Synthetic
We had a gap in our monitoring along the lines of synthetic-user monitoring. We needed consistent availability monitoring of our web applications.
Pros
- It is an easy-to-use product and you can build out checks with Firefox Selenium IDE (no longer supported). A good measure of availability.
- Set the standard for synthetic checks and several APMs have copied that.
Cons
- It's very clunky. Infrastructure is large and very difficult to upgrade.
- SaaS and On-premise versions are different. There is an LDAP integration but users can only be assigned to one group (i.e. department). If you are in 2 departments, you need 2 separate logins.
- Update: they now offer federated logins
- It filled a gap in monitoring for us, but we're looking to move on.
- Got visibility into availability other than relying on just canary pages.
- Helps better understand geographic latency and browser-specific issues
Seemed to work well, but we didn't want to do a long renewal. Other products are maturing and better integrated with our systems. It works for now, but we're looking to replace it.
Update: New Relic has caught up with Apica and seems to integrate better with the other aspects of APM.
Update: New Relic has caught up with Apica and seems to integrate better with the other aspects of APM.
Do you think Apica Synthetic delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Apica Synthetic's feature set?
Yes
Did Apica Synthetic live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Apica Synthetic go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Apica Synthetic again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation