Paragan will save your behind on failing drives!
Overall Satisfaction with Paragon Hard Disk Manager
Our whole organization uses it to clone hard drives and to migrate computer hard drives to dissimilar hardware.
Pros
- When you have a hard drive that is physically failing with CHKDSK errors, it will often somehow still clone it and make it work on the new system.
- It can take a computer's operating system installation and make it work on dissimilar hardware.
Cons
- If it's installed to a CD it takes forever to boot to it. Better off a USB stick.
- It takes a very long time to clone a failing drive (understandably) and you have no idea how long it will take. Estimated times are not accurate.
- It has had a positive impact on our business objectives because it has gotten us out of some difficult situations where drives would not clone otherwise. It saves a reload of a computer, therefore a lot of time saved.
Paragon is better in some areas, worse in others.
Better at cloning unhealthy drives. Worse at quick clones.
Acronis is a little more intuitive. Paragon has some dialog that I don't think translates well to English.
Do you think Paragon Hard Disk Manager delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Paragon Hard Disk Manager's feature set?
Yes
Did Paragon Hard Disk Manager live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Paragon Hard Disk Manager go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Paragon Hard Disk Manager again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation