Amberscript, headquartered in Amsterdam, helps users transform audio and video to text and subtitles through the use of its AI-driven on-demand software service.
$1.40
per minute
iScribeHealth
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
iScribeHealth is a tool designed to reduce the administrative burden on physicians. iScribeHealth offers HIPAA compliant documentation services that integrate with multiple EHR's to streamline medical documentation and restore an authentic physician-patient relationship. iScribeHealth's mobile app gives providers anytime/anywhere access via iPhone or iPad to view and enter clinical information for patients. It leverages industry-leading speech-to-text technology…
N/A
Pricing
Amberscript
iScribeHealth
Editions & Modules
Pre-Paid
$10
per hour of audio or video uploaded
Subscription
$25
per month
Manual transcription
from $1.40
per minute
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amberscript
iScribeHealth
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
Discount available for annual subscription.
Pricing varies depending on the services used and size of the practice.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amberscript
iScribeHealth
Considered Both Products
Amberscript
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Amberscript
I feel that Amazon Transcribe was much more feature-rich, allowing for a much more real-time solution, whereas Amberscript is great for transcribing existing call recordings (or video files) to a rich text file. Amazon Transcribe will do both, while Amberscript only does the …
Amberscript is great for transcribing individual audio (or video) files that reside on your computer. The ability to view and edit the text of the text file (to correct or remove data that you don't want to be shared) before the output is a great option. I feel it may be limited in the ability to transcribe live audio records such as phone calls or meetings, where we would find it very useful to have immediate access to a transcript (for coaching or sharing purposes). I feel the needs are more designed as a solution for pre-existing audio/video files versus working in real-time.
I feel that Amazon Transcribe was much more feature-rich, allowing for a much more real-time solution, whereas Amberscript is great for transcribing existing call recordings (or video files) to a rich text file. Amazon Transcribe will do both, while Amberscript only does the latter. For our business, this was a significant feature loss for Amberscript.
Having an automated speech-to-text conversion allows us to reduce human hours, which would normally take notes or have to review long audio files.
Being able to transcribe multiple call recordings into a searchable text format allows for coaching of issues in a much more efficient format than an audio recording.