Likelihood to Recommend Apache Flume is well suited when the use case is log data ingestion and aggregate only, for example for compliance of configuration management. It is not well suited where you need a general-purpose real-time data ingestion pipeline that can receive log data and other forms of data streams (eg IoT, messages).
Read full review Azure Data Lake is an absolutely essential piece of a modern data and analytics platform. Over the past 2 years, our usage of Azure Data Lake as a reporting source has continued to grow and far exceeds more traditional sources like MS SQL, Oracle, etc.
Read full review Pros Multiple sources of data (sources) and destinations (sinks) that allows you to move data form and to any relevant data storage It is very easy to setup and run Very open to personalization, you can create filters, enrichment, new sources and destinations Read full review Setting up Azure Data Lake Storage account, container is quite easy Access from anywhere and easy maintenance Integration with Azure Data Factory service for end to end pipeline is pretty easy Can store Any form of data (Structured, Unstructured, Semi) in faster manner Read full review Cons It is very specific for log data ingestion so it is pretty hard to use for anything else besides log data Data replication is not built in and needs to be added on top of Apache Flume (not a hard job to do though) Read full review study for the certifications also to have them as a reference for work when you have any questions about applying a configuration to the equipment. The Internet interface is simple and easy to use. Capacity is good and it's good that HP continues to innovate with this technology Read full review Support Rating Apache Flume is open-source so support is limited. Never the less, it has great documentation and best practices documents from their end-users so it is not hard to use, setup and configure.
Read full review Alternatives Considered Apache Flume is a very good solution when your project is not very complex at transformation and enrichment, and good if you have an external management suite like Cloudera, Hortonworks, etc. But it is not a real EAI or ETL like AB Initio or Attunity so you need to know exactly what you want. On the other hand being an opensource project give Apache a lot of room to personalize thanks to its plug-able architecture and has a very nice performance having a very low CPU and Memory footprint, a single server can do the job on many occasions, as opposed to the multi-server architecture of paid products.
Read full review Azure Data Lake Storage from a functionality perspective is a much easier solution to work with. It's implementation from
Amazon EMR went smooth, and continued usage is definitely better. However,
Amazon EMR was significantly cheaper overall between the high transaction fees and cost of storage due to growth. The two both have their advantages and disadvantages, but the functionality of Azure Data Lake Storage outweighed it's cost
Read full review Return on Investment Flume has simplified a lot many of our ingest procedures, easier to deploy and integrate than a classical EAI, reducing the time to market But opposed to EAIs if the project starts to grow in complexity Apache Flume project may not be as suitable Read full review Instead of having separate pools of storage for data we are now operating on a single layer platform which has cut down on time spent on maintaining those separate pools. We have had more of an ROI with the scalability as we are able to control costs of storage when need be. We are able to operate in a more streamlined approach as we are able to stay within the Azure suite of products and integrate seamlessly with the rest of the applications in our cloud-based infrastructure Read full review ScreenShots