98 Reviews and Ratings
16 Reviews and Ratings
As I mentioned earlier, the Apache HTTP Server has a small disadvantage compared to the competition (NGINX) in terms of performance. If you run websites that really have a lot of visitors, NGINX might be the better alternative. On the other hand, the Apache HTTP Server is open source and free. Further functionalities can be activated via modules. The documentation is really excellent.Incentivized
Glassfish is well suited for large-scale cluster deployments and integrates well with F5 load balancers.Incentivized
Street Cred: Apache Web Server is the Founder for all of Apache Foundation's other projects. Without the Web Server, Apache Foundation would look very different. That being said, they have done a good job of maintaining the code base, and keeping a lot of what makes Apache so specialStability: Apache is rock-solid. While no software is perfect, Apache can parse your web sources quickly and cleanly.Flexibility: Need to startup your own Webpage? Done. Wordpress? Yup. REST Endpoint? Check. Honeypot? Absolutely.Incentivized
The product offers Java EE support.As the version supported by Oracle we have an extensive documentation, the Oracle GlassFish server online documentation library, patches ,and support from the supplier.Ease of use through the administration console.Integration with the NetBeans development interface.Incentivized
The default configurations which comes with Apache server needs to get optimized for performance and security with every new installation as these defaults are not recommended to push on the production environment directly.Security options and advanced configurations are not easy to set up and require an additional level of expertise.Admin frontend GUI could be improved to a great extent to match with other enterprise tools available to serve similar requirements.Incentivized
One of the areas where we found Glassfish adaptation difficult for our company was the lack of documentation and community forums covering important issues.We ran into a roadblock with OAuth 2.0 implementation and did not get great support on that issue.Incentivized
I give this rating because there is so much Apache documentation and information on the web that you can literally do anything. This has to do with the fact that there is a huge Open Source community that is beyond mature and perhaps one of the most helpful to be found. The only thing that should hold anyone back from anything is that they can not read. RTFM, my friend. And I must say that the manual is excellent.Incentivized
I has a lot more features, except that IIS is more integrated in a Windows environment. But now with .net core also possible from Apache it would work anywhere really. Only in a full Windows environment where full integration is needed I would chose to go for IIS. Otherwise Apache it is.Incentivized
At the time we did a small proof of concept with both platforms and Oracle Glassfish had more intuitive administration and configuration functionsIncentivized
Works as intended, so it's less to worry about.Works great on elastic environments (like EC2).As an Open Source project, you can get support for almost any problem you can have.Configuration files, while powerful, can be tricky to dominate for some.Incentivized
Glassfish which initially spun off from an Open Source project has a community edition which is free to use and offers great ROI.In comparison to cloud offerings like AWS and Google App Engine, Glassfish requires more cost upfront for installation and management.Incentivized