AppMaster.io vs. HCL Domino

You can create a full-fledged mobile application that other people will use

Domino is best in medium-sized businesses of 20-100 employees. It's too complicated to implement in very small companies unless you have good external resources. It scales up very well for larger companies but the pressures of users wanting particular "brand-name" software can become difficult. If you want a restricted "extranet/portal" system for a limited set of members it's a great system, particularly if you add a Domino CRM on top. Unlike Microsoft, you never have to resort to command-line tools, like PowerShell, in Domino to get things done.

Incentivized

• Intuitive drag and drop interface.
• Database builder: this allows your team to speed up the dev process.
• Deployment is fast and the platform helps you avoid many of the possible deployment errors caused by human factors.
• You can run the app offline.

• Domino support for policy-based user registration and deployment eases end-user creation.
• User access to databases is simplified via group membership and defined roles.
• Email replication to clustered servers is simplified through connection/replication documents stored centralized address book
• Group calendaring enabled at client level controls.

Incentivized

• Landing page template
• Front end perfect design
• Detail documentation

• User interface needs to be modernised.

Incentivized

Very quick replies, very thorough answers, they help with even the smallest cases and always are there when you have even the most stupid questions.

The main strength of AppMaster.io in comparison to Bubble is its more vivid and logical data models and business logic design. Thus, AppMaster helps better understanding the overall logic as well as specific details of the projects being developed.

We use SharePoint, SQL and Teams but only for the things that they excel in. For example, we use teams for small team interactions (including external participants). We use teams for meetings too. We've discovered that Teams collaboration is not as full-functional as Domino and more importantly, that our members (financial services) do not trust the Open Office365 cloud. SharePoint and Team collaborative features are often blocked in our member organizations. Domino is much easier to identify and unblock at the firewall level. It's much easier to restrict collaboration to approved options in Domino.

Incentivized

• We can develop faster with a smaller team.

• The immediate impact on my organization as a non-profit is cost. Enterprise pricing for a Domino solution is exponentially more inexpensive than more popular applications.
• Of the most obvious impacts is user familiarity. Given a vast majority of the employment pool having familiarity with MS products, orienting new employees to Domino\Notes is burdensome. Adoption is slow and resistance is high.
• Hiring Domino administrators and developers is increasingly challenging.
• The recent sale of the Domino platform away from IBM is concerning.

Incentivized