Aqua Cloud Native Security Platform vs. Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Aqua Cloud Native Security Platform
Score 6.4 out of 10
N/A
The Aqua Platform is an integrated Cloud Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP), that prioritizes risk and automates prevention while also focussing on detection and response across the lifecycle. It aims to stop current and prevent future cloud native attacks.
$10,188
per year
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Prisma Cloud, from Palo Alto Networks (based on technology acquired with Evident.io, or the Evident Security Platform) is presented as a comprehensive Cloud Native Security Platform (CNSP) that delivers full lifecycle security and full stack protection for multi- and hybrid-cloud environments. The solution is dedicated to reducing attack surface and checking for vulnerabilities against known or custom signatures of threats and provides daily risk reports, and also detects what users were…N/A
Pricing
Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformPalo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Editions & Modules
Team
$10,188
per year
Advanced
$25,188
per year
Enterprise
Tiered Pricing
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformPalo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformPalo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Considered Both Products
Aqua Cloud Native Security Platform

No answer on this topic

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Chose Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Each solution has some or the other feature which is USP within that solution but based on our requirement we found Palo Alto Prisma is Meeting most of our requirements since we want to monitor workload/Services hosted on both Cloud/On-Prem.
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformPalo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformPalo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
6.8
(2 ratings)
8.7
(5 ratings)
Usability
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Aqua Cloud Native Security PlatformPalo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
Aqua Security
Excellent tool for identifying Cloud security issues such as vulnerabilities or misconfigurations. The complaince scanning ability is perfect for enterprise organization to maintain complaince based off various complaince programs.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
Finding specific Cloud Vendor specific Cloud resource configuration, tags, network information and etc. is fairly easy to do. Cloud alert capabilities are pretty good and with proper knowledge top notch alerts can be created. Only downside I can think of is ease of use.
Read full review
Pros
Aqua Security
  • seamless integration with GitHub, Jfrog, etc
  • Easy configuration of security policy
  • detailed instructions regarding finding of Vulnerabilities
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Vulnerability assessment using Twistlock
  • Enhancing Security by scanning workload based on different Security standards and provide a compliance report
  • CF template integration with CI/CD pipeline to identify any security issue before workload are deployed
  • IAM/UEBA features additional to enchaining security posture
  • Auto remediation
  • Integration is simple and solution is supported on multiple cloud
  • Customized dashboard/queries
Read full review
Cons
Aqua Security
  • The UI/UX of the Aqua platform has several issues, especially with the sign up/in flow, authentication, alerts and display of results
  • Missing a few prominent notification channels for alerts such as Datadog, Webhooks
  • Lacks complete granularity in RBAC with the ability to set permissions based on the cloud
  • Some parts of the cocumentation for connecting an Oracle Cloud account is not up to update or clear
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Real-time supports would be much appreciated. At the moment they have a third-party ticketing support tool, which can be replaced with real-time support, which can be provided to the user at the time of the issue.
  • The user should be provided with all the learning material by the Palo Alto team at the time of license purchase. This would save a lot of users' time, which is taken up by research and finding the correct documents from the website.
  • Themes can be introduced in the feature set, which would help the user customize the software as per their needs.
Read full review
Usability
Aqua Security
The UI and UX of the platform requires some work since the platform is not for all screen sizes and the experience with certain features such as authentication and creating alerts is not great. The session times out while performing an action and having to repeat the entire action once again, which is not a great experience. Adding notification channels while creating the alerts is not seamless. But the platform has good UX with some great documentation for integrations along with the ability to customise dashboards.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Aqua Security
Aqua Cloud Native Security Platform is easy to implement and manage compare the Dome9.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
Our organization didn't consider any other tool, and so far we are pretty much satisfied with Prisma Cloud.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Aqua Security
  • ROI is high with our Aqua project.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Investigation time is severely reduced
  • Has potential to identify misconfigurations
  • Hard to setup
Read full review
ScreenShots