Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform vs. Tenable Security Center

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Archer
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
RSA Archer, from the security, governance, and risk division of RSA Security is an integrated risk management / GRC platform.N/A
Tenable Security Center
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) from Tenable Network Security in Baltimore, presents a vulnerabiliy management option used to identify and prioritize vulnerabilities based on risk to businesses. It is managed on premises.N/A
Pricing
Archer Integrated Risk Management PlatformTenable Security Center
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ArcherTenable Security Center
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Archer Integrated Risk Management PlatformTenable Security Center
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Archer Integrated Risk Management PlatformTenable Security Center
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Archer Integrated Risk Management Platform
9.5
13 Ratings
23% above category average
Tenable Security Center
-
Ratings
Common repository of GRC items8.712 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk management10.011 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems8.89 Ratings00 Ratings
GRC policy management9.913 Ratings00 Ratings
Incident management10.013 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Archer Integrated Risk Management PlatformTenable Security Center
Small Businesses
Rencore Code (SPCAF)
Rencore Code (SPCAF)
Score 8.8 out of 10
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.8 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.8 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Archer Integrated Risk Management PlatformTenable Security Center
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(13 ratings)
10.0
(7 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.3
(2 ratings)
9.4
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Archer Integrated Risk Management PlatformTenable Security Center
Likelihood to Recommend
RSA Security
RSA Archer is fantastic at cataloguing, personalizing assessments, raw reporting, and capacity to add custom fields. It is a little clunky around adding contextual information to notifications, peeking into data before attempting to load pages, quick navigation or determining linked (or sub-linked) relationships. These are all concerns that can either be worked around with an appropriate data scheme or with careful administration of the sub-routines.
Read full review
Tenable
[Tenable.sc (formerly SecurityCenter)] does very well for internal scanning for vulnerabilities, however it needs to be combined with Tenable.io in order to do cloud scanning.
Read full review
Pros
RSA Security
  • Integration capabilities to multiple enterprise systems
  • Control standards and Procedures to address multiple regulatory/authoritative sources, standards and frameworks enabling test once satisfy many requiremnts
  • Rapid application development and User friendly tool with configuration capability to customize easily without user requiring programming or coding skills
Read full review
Tenable
  • Vulnerability management from one place
  • Maximum endpoint visibility
  • Easy to set up and plan the structure
  • Support desk quickly responses
  • Well-prepared documentation
  • Broad scanning type
  • Supports various compliance standards
  • User groups allows coordination between teams
Read full review
Cons
RSA Security
  • They release time to time updates, which causes issues in the GUI. However, one has to be careful while installing the update.
  • There is no open and free academy to learn more about the tool.
  • One cannot stay to a particular product version, they have to move to the next version to keep up with the changes.
Read full review
Tenable
  • Centralized vulnerability management with sensors.
  • Network health assessment and Incident response.
  • For alerting or notification, it should also support the SMS gateway.
Read full review
Usability
RSA Security
Good tool to get the information communicated, approval workflow, and easy to add new findings/questionnaires. Seems to be compatible with different browsers and little downtime. Only request for improvement is to add an export feature with fewer clicks. Maybe batch export.
Read full review
Tenable
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
RSA Security
Our RSA Archer team is dedicated to finding solutions for our organization. They haven't mentioned any issues with receiving support with deployment or bug fixes, and generally the platform is very dependable. They are always very excited about delivering a version upgrade and presenting any new features that provide more dashboards or chart types.
Read full review
Tenable
On all of the occasions that I have had to reach out to Tenable for assistance, they have been extremely helpful and knowledgeable. Solutions and support are provided quickly, and they work on the issue until it is resolved.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
RSA Security
It has been roughly 5 years since I have seen Securevue, so a lot can change, but to me it felt like several products were purchased and an attempt was made to piece them all together into a single solution (and I believe that may have been true). It also required agents on endpoints which did not fit the model I believed customers were looking for. MetricStream appeared to be difficult to install as it took their own engineers some time to get it installed in my lab environment. I did not think their web interface was as intuitive as RSA Archer. Customization to the platform was possible to some degree, but required a lot more work and technical skills than required by Archer. I did like the landing page for MetricStream which called out the important action items for the current user, but Archer v6.X now has this feature.
Read full review
Tenable
We decided to go with Tenable due to its robust reporting capabilities and competitive pricing vs its competitors. While all tools are very similar in regards to scanning capabilities we prefer Tenable SC's user interface. We also like the option to have both on-prem and cloud with theirs. Tenable io product as well.
Read full review
Return on Investment
RSA Security
  • We were able to achieve approx 63% gain in operational efficiency.
  • Reduce the number of findings and exceptions during an Internal audit to almost zero.
  • Get compliance to all client contracts tracked through the tool thus increasing the confidence of clients in our systems and processes.
Read full review
Tenable
  • Create internal/operational efficiencies
  • Improve compliance & risk management
  • Cost management
  • Solid vulnerability scanner
  • Ease, of use, and capabilities when it comes to analyzing vulnerabilities is what makes this product stand out
Read full review
ScreenShots