TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

AWS Control Tower vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    AWS Control Tower

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AThe vendor presents AWS Control Tower as the easiest way to set up and govern a new, secure multi-account AWS environment. With AWS Control Tower, builders can provision new AWS accounts in a few clicks, while knowing new accounts conform to company-wide policies.N/A

    Tufin Orchestration Suite

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AIsraeli company Tufin offers a firewall security management offering via the Tufin Orchestration Suite, including SecureApp for managing network connectivity, SecureChange network change automation, and SecureTrack multi-vendor and next-generation firewall management.N/A
    Pricing
    AWS Control TowerTufin Orchestration Suite
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AWS Control TowerTufin Orchestration Suite
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    AWS Control TowerTufin Orchestration Suite
    Firewall Security Management
    Comparison of Firewall Security Management features of AWS Control Tower and Tufin Orchestration Suite
    Feature
    AWS Control Tower
    -
    Ratings
    Tufin Orchestration Suite
    8.2
    2 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Policy planning and rule management00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
    Automated Policy Orchestration00 Ratings7.92 Ratings
    Device Discovery00 Ratings6.92 Ratings
    Policy Compliance Auditing00 Ratings8.62 Ratings
    Attack Path Simulation Testing00 Ratings5.62 Ratings
    Anomalous Event or Behavior Deviation00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Vulnerability Scans00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Firewall Rule Cleanup00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AWS Control TowerTufin Orchestration Suite
    Small Businesses
    Armor
    Score6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Trend Micro Deep Security
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Palo Alto Panorama
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    AWS CloudTrail
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Palo Alto Panorama
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AWS Control TowerTufin Orchestration Suite
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    7.3
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AWS Control TowerTufin Orchestration Suite
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    We were wanting to prove the concept of a low touch process for quickly spinning up boilerplate AWS environments. We were able to get started quickly and to ensure that the AWS Well-Architected Framework principles were followed - at least upfront - however, we found that for our use case and expertise level it ultimately wasn't a fit. We have the skills on our team to manage more of this on our own. My recommendation would be contingent on what skills are already available on your team: if you can "do it yourself" you might as well so that you don't pay for resources you don't need and you have finer grain control over what's created.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    Well suited scenarios - 1) Firewall Policy / Ruleset management 2) Where all the products are from Tufin like TOS ST, SC, SecureApp etc 3) Where customer focuses on ruleset compliance - USP violations, and other features Less suited - 1) Agnostic/distributed environment - Tough with integrate with 3rd party like CyberArk 2) FW recertification processes / exception process when complex process is included
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • Easily create new AWS accounts.
    • Easily secure and manage AWS accounts.
    • Landing zone with SSO is a huge win for larger teams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    • Firewall management
    • Compliance reports
    • Unused rules and optimization
    • Policy Automation
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • The AWS SSO GUI is not very intuitive and determining how to apply policies to users without creating redundant logins has been a challenge.
    • The default guardrails do not fully encompass all the security checks that we needed.
    • There does not appear to be any way to control roles at the IAM level from the control tower account through the GUI.
    • Some features on AWS accounts still require logging into the individual account with the root user and cannot be done from AWS Control Tower.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    • Palo Alto Networks Integration
    • Better/more user friendly api for integration with ticketing systems
    • Web UI structure is not user-friendly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    There is no way to easily close an AWS account whether it was created manually or via the AWS Control Tower. It takes too many steps to close it vs to provision a new AWS account
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    Using AWS Systems Manager and other slightly lower level components has been helpful for us to manage parts of our AWS presence at a more granular level than AWS Control Tower was designed for. It's not at all an apples-to-apples comparison as they solve different use cases, but for us, the use case associated with AWS Systems Manager was a better fit for our specific needs and skillsets. We did not need everything that AWS Control Tower was doing for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    1) Fairly okay overall but definitely needs improvement overall Vs the other products available in the market like Palo Alto XSOAR 2) Cost wise okay at the beginning but when client demands add-ons/ more features/customization tailored to their needs, Tufin Orchestration Suite recommends RFE / custom costs/development costs 3) USP feature is cool to use overall Vs FireMon 4) Tufin ProServ needs to buckle-up/Support compared to other competitors in the market
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • Less time manually deploying accounts which was error prone.
    • Central logging allowed us to have 1 place to view logs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tufin
    • I think if you correctly configure your SIEM, you don't need Tufin. You can correlate a lot of things for firewalls.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots