What users are saying about
2 Ratings
139 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.3 out of 100
2 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

    Platform-as-a-Service

    8.7

    Azure App Service

    87%

    Engine Yard

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    Azure App Service ranks higher in 11/11 features

    Ease of building user interfaces

    8.7
    87%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Scalability

    9.6
    96%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Platform management overhead

    8.4
    84%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Workflow engine capability

    8.0
    80%
    2 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Platform access control

    8.3
    83%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Services-enabled integration

    8.9
    89%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Development environment creation

    8.6
    86%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Development environment replication

    9.3
    93%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Issue monitoring and notification

    8.5
    85%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Issue recovery

    8.7
    87%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Upgrades and platform fixes

    8.4
    84%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Attribute Ratings

    • Azure App Service is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

    Likelihood to Recommend

    8.1

    Azure App Service

    81%
    7 Ratings
    8.0

    Engine Yard

    80%
    1 Rating

    Likelihood to Renew

    Azure App Service

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.0

    Engine Yard

    80%
    1 Rating

    Support Rating

    10.0

    Azure App Service

    100%
    4 Ratings

    Engine Yard

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Likelihood to Recommend

    Microsoft

    You may easily deploy your apps to Azure App Service if they were written in Visual Studio IDE (typically.NET applications). With a few clicks of the mouse, you may already deploy your application to a remote server using the Visual Studio IDE. As a result of the portal's bulk and complexity, I propose Heroku for less-experienced developers.
    Read full review

    Engine Yard

    It is best for rapidly getting your application to the cloud without worrying about standing up cloud infrastructure
    Read full review

    Pros

    Microsoft

    • It has options to deploy using CI/CD.
    • It has great integration with Azure Devops
    • It has all the common runtimes, so we don't need to install softwares.
    Read full review

    Engine Yard

    • Quick deployments
    • Easily integrate your code from GitHub
    • Ability to recover site quickly to different zone when AWS has a widespread outage
    Read full review

    Cons

    Microsoft

    • the learning curve can be tough (just like other azure services)
    • the UX/UI could be more intuitive (just like other azure services as well)
    • monitoring can be hard to understand
    • Microsoft's learning resources are hard to understand
    Read full review

    Engine Yard

    • Embracing new Amazon Web Servicess(AWS) features
    • Security groups need more granularity
    • Audit trails of what happens by who in environment, especially when VM is deleted
    Read full review

    Pricing Details

    Azure App Service

    Starting Price

    $9.49 per month

    Editions & Modules

    Azure App Service editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules
    Shared Environment for dev/test$9.491
    Basic Dedicated environment for dev/test$54.752
    Standard Run production workloads$733
    Premium Enhanced performance and scale$1464

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    Free and Shared (preview) plans are ideal for testing applications in a managed Azure environment. Basic, Standard and Premium plans are for production workloads and run on dedicated Virtual Machine instances. Each instance can support multiple applications and domains.

    Engine Yard

    Starting Price

    $800 Per Month Per Cluster

    Editions & Modules

    Engine Yard editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules
    Platform$800.001

    Footnotes

    1. Per Month Per Cluster

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    Likelihood to Renew

    Microsoft

    No answers on this topic

    Engine Yard

    Ease of use
    Read full review

    Support Rating

    Microsoft

    We had an issue where we deployed too large of a resource and didn't notice until the bill came through. They were very understanding and saw we weren't utilizing the resources so they issued a generous refund in about 4 hours. Very fast, friendly, and understanding support reps from my experience.
    Read full review

    Engine Yard

    No answers on this topic

    Alternatives Considered

    Microsoft

    Azure has many data center, their services are more reliable. Azure has way more features than both Linode and DigitalOcean. If someone wants a complete reliable service, he/she must go to Azure instead of Linode and DigitalOcean because even though azure charges more, it is worth the money you pay there.
    Read full review

    Engine Yard

    More closely aligns to native AWS
    Read full review

    Return on Investment

    Microsoft

    • Reduced the deployment time of ASP .NET applications in the company.
    • Gave us an alternative to quickly deploy our applications without granting access to the version control system to a third platform.
    Read full review

    Engine Yard

    • Positive in the sense that we can deploy new applications quickly for MVP
    Read full review

    Add comparison