Azure Monitor vs. Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Monitor
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Monitor is used to analyze and optimize the performance of web applications and infrastructure, including virtual machines (VMs), Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS), Azure Storage, and databases.
$2.76
pay as you go per GB
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's System Center Operations Manager (SCOM) is a monitoring and application performance management option, with the core datacenter and cloud-based systems monitoring.N/A
Pricing
Azure MonitorMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Editions & Modules
Pay-As-You-Go
$2.76
per GB
100 GB per day
$219.5
2 per day
200 GB per day
$412.1
6 per day
300 GB per day
$604.8
0 per day
400 GB per day
$788.4
8 per day
500 GB per day
$968.8
0 per day
600 GB per day
$1,904
per day
700 GB per day
$3,718
40 per day
800 GB per day
$9,016
per day
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure MonitorMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure MonitorMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Features
Azure MonitorMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure Monitor
-
Ratings
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
6.4
23 Ratings
19% below category average
Application monitoring00 Ratings5.021 Ratings
Database monitoring00 Ratings8.023 Ratings
Threshold alerts00 Ratings10.023 Ratings
Predictive capabilities00 Ratings6.821 Ratings
Application performance management console00 Ratings3.020 Ratings
Collaboration tools00 Ratings5.018 Ratings
Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications00 Ratings7.821 Ratings
Application dependency mapping and thresholding00 Ratings5.919 Ratings
Virtualization monitoring00 Ratings7.021 Ratings
Server availability and performance monitoring00 Ratings8.122 Ratings
Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery00 Ratings2.119 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure MonitorMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Small Businesses
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
NetBrain Technologies
NetBrain Technologies
Score 9.2 out of 10
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure MonitorMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(2 ratings)
8.0
(26 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
6.7
(2 ratings)
9.0
(9 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure MonitorMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
We were able to get a single pane of glass for all our monitoring needs on Azure Monitor. However, we would like to see it improve to auto scale out and scale in depending on the load without human intervention. This can help us get to the No Ops model and rely on automated processes rather than manual intervention.
Read full review
Microsoft
More appropriate for:
  • Pure Microsoft ecosystem environments (Windows Server and SQL server) and the most common Linux and UNIX platforms.
  • Environments where cost is less of a factor than settling on a single platform for monitoring
  • Environments where the administrators are familiar with the setup and installation of SCOM.
Less appropriate for:
  • Pure UNIX/Linux shops, especially versions not supported out of the box by SCOM.
  • Shops that cannot afford the engagement to setup/configure and maintain on a continuous basis.
  • Shops that cannot dedicate personnel to the care and feeding of SCOM, especially when supporting larger environments.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • It supports all the Azure PAAS services.
  • Can monitor both infrastructure and application
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Allows us to visualize our systems in a single interface and see the status of health as well as relevant performance metrics.
  • A flexible and powerful interface with active alerting covering domain controllers, SQL servers, etc...
  • Allows you to customize your views and workspaces for specific tasks and needs.
  • Reporting is powerful and flexible.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Custom metrics
  • Ease of use
Read full review
Microsoft
  • One of the biggest drawbacks to SCOM is the sheer scope and complexity of the system. This can be a pro and a con. The system is very customizable, what you put into it is what you'll get out of it. That said, the learning curve is fairly steep. An organization needs to be committed to putting time and resources into SCOM to get the most out of it. I've heard stories from colleagues of several different companies that invested in SCOM and then abandoned it due to the excessive time and care required.
  • SCOM is expensive. Not only is the enterprise licensing costly, SCOM requires it's own servers, operational and warehouse databases to be maintained.
  • The OOB SCOM reports are a bit clunky and feel outdated.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager is tightly integrated to Microsoft Windows servers os monitoring with great product support.
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Ease of Use and user friendly dashboard
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
I have not had to work with Azure Monitor support, so it is difficult to say how well the support team is. I assume that Azure has a well-versed team on the customer service side to assist with any issues customers may have. I may need them in the feature.
Read full review
Microsoft
Hard to get support. The product is not being actively developed anymore, so it is hard to get new features for the product.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Easy to install with intuitive interactive interface during the installation process a and integration to MS SQL was smooth
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
While other tools have their own unique capability, Azure Monitor helps us monitor essential PAAS services that are not supported by other tools. So even though we have one other APM tool, we still rely on Azure Monitor for some of the special PAAS services, this is a huge advantage.
Read full review
Microsoft
We used Altiris and WSUS and in the beginning Altiris had the better admin interface than SCOM, but it is no longer the case as SCOM has refined their admin interface. Altiris still has better and more robust group assignments for management roles and those two other tools can better manage non Windows OS devices than SCOM but for a large enterprise Windows shop, if you can afford it, SCOM is the way to go.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • We are able to react quickly to the issues.
  • Debugging sessions are yielding quicker results to generate RCA.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • It has allowed us to provide an Enterprise Event/Alert management solution to the Global company
  • It has taken a long time to get it to provide valuable alerts and information, lots of user resources and investment.
  • It assists with 24/7 monitoring and out of hours support
Read full review
ScreenShots